Cannabis Update

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


ShaRpY HaRdY

Main Event Mafia
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
13,126
Reaction score
2,777
Points
0
Age
33
Location
Columbus, OH
Well election day took place yesterday and two more states fully legalized recreational use of marijuana; Oregon became the 3rd state to pass a bill that allows it while shortly after that Alaska became the 4th.. Those two states weren't the only locations in the United States to pass a measure regarding full or some sort of legalization of Cannabis.. Washington, DC voters passed a measure as well..
Washington, D.C.'s proposal, while scaled back compared to the others, allows for a person over 21 years old to posses up to two ounces of marijuana for personal use and grow up to six cannabis plants in their home. It also allows people to transfer up to one ounce of marijuana to another person, but not sell it.
The issue with D.C. is that's a district and not a state so the lawmakers can overrule that one.

It's pretty big to have two more states added to the full legalization for recreation as well as knowing that voters in the nation's capitol wanted to somewhat legalize it as well.

I don't really smoke too much anymore but if we ever get at least medical in Ohio I will be eating more edibles.. so much easier on me rather than fucking up my lungs when most of the seasons I have bad allergies (excluding Winter).
 

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
You know what state won't? Wisconsin. Fuck making money and having smart regulations.

Prostitution, drugs, and guns should all be equally regulated. You keep it out of young persons hands and prosecute the older generation who provide them. Also Meth and X can stay illegal, along with prescription shit. Mushrooms, Weed, Coke, anything that is majority natural should be regulated and legalized. People who don't want to do coke won't, and the people who do it anyway will still find another way. I'd rather exclude the shitty drug dealer we all have met before.
 

TheTNHMaster

George Bush doesn't care about black people.
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
5,486
Reaction score
2,452
Points
0
Location
Yuengling Factory 101
You know what state won't? Wisconsin. Fuck making money and having smart regulations.

Prostitution, drugs, and guns should all be equally regulated. You keep it out of young persons hands and prosecute the older generation who provide them. Also Meth and X can stay illegal, along with prescription shit. Mushrooms, Weed, Coke, anything that is majority natural should be regulated and legalized. People who don't want to do coke won't, and the people who do it anyway will still find another way. I'd rather exclude the shitty drug dealer we all have met before.
Have fun with Scott Walker btw.
 

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
Have fun with Scott Walker btw.
Our election was truly turd sandwich vs the giant douche. Bitch who got fired by her own family vs too stupid to graduate college.

People in Wisconsin don't care, abortion laws and same sex marriage are what most of these red necks with fat wives vote on. I didn't even vote, the two couldn't be worse options. Al Gore could have ran for WI Democrat and won by leaps and bounds for the option we had. Newt fucking Gingrich could have ran out Scotty Walker.

I hate this justice system, but am really hoping Walker goes for the voucher system, it's the only thing he does that appeals to me, and Mary Burke is a fucktard millionaire. She belongs in the real dykes of Wisconsin show. They just sit around while the camera focuses on why their husbands have to cheat on them.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheTNHMaster

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Silly states doing silly things. Oh well.
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
42
Location
Maine
South Portland, ME - one of the biggest cities in the state - also had a referendum passed to make recreational marijuana legal in the city up to a certain amount. However, another larger city in Maine - Lewiston (its a filthy hole, trust me) - also had a referendum for the same thing but it failed by less than 1,000 votes. How they plan on managing the stuff in this state when its 'legal' in one city but not another that is pretty close to it is beyond me.

In South Portland, residents voted 6,326 to 5,755 in favor of an ordinance that declares it legal for adults to possess small amounts of the drug. Lewiston residents rejected a similar ordinance by a vote of 7,366 to 6,044.
http://www.pressherald.com/2014/11/...rs-support-legalizing-recreational-marijuana/
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Have they classified what counts as a small amount?
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
42
Location
Maine

u_cant_c_me

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
424
Points
0
Age
34
Location
the bay
I'm loving this thread right now Cannabis is the a great mediation u may agree with me or not i find it really helpful I have had it for Pain and to help me eat

Medical marijuana
Medical marijuana sign at a dispensary on Ventura Boulevard inLos Angeles, California
Main articles: California Proposition 215 (1996) and California Senate Bill 420
California's medical marijuana program was established when state voters approved Proposition 215 (also known as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996)[17] on the November 5, 1996 ballot with a 55% majority.[18] The proposition added Section 11362.5 to the California Health and Safety Code, modifying state law to allow people with cancer, anorexia, AIDS,spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraines or other chronic illnesses the "legal right to obtain or grow, and use marijuana for medical purposes when recommended by a doctor". The law also mandated that doctors not be punished for recommending the drug, and required that federal and state governments work together "to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need."[17][18] Proposition 215 does not affect federal law, which still prohibits the cultivation and possession of marijuana.

On October 7, 2011 an extensive and coordinated crackdown on California's dispensaries was announced by the chief prosecutors of the state's four Federal districts.,[19] leading to concerns among advocates and patients that a de facto nullification of state medical marijuana laws was in the offing.

Recreational marijuana[edit]
This section requires expansion.(June 2010)
In November 2010 California voters were presented with Proposition 19 that would have effectively made possession and cultivation of marijuana legal for everyone over the age of 21, and would regulate it similarly to alcohol. If passed, Proposition 19 would not only provide much needed revenue for the Californian budget, but would virtually eliminate marijuana grown illegally on public lands, removing the threat of hikers, hunters, fishermen and others walking into illegal grow operations and quite possibly boobytraps set up by illegal growers. California's Proposition 19 has the support of many law enforcement agencies as it would free up much needed resources and allow them to direct them into areas of law enforcement that they are really needed, such as the eradication of illegal drug labs where methamphetamine is manufactured.[5]

On February 23, 2009,[20] Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D) introduced the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act, a proposed bill that would "remove all penalties under California law for the cultivation, transportation, sale, purchase, possession, and use of marijuana, natural THC and paraphernalia by persons over the age of 21" and "prohibit local and state law enforcement officials from enforcing federal marijuana laws".[21] The bill would help with battling the 2008–2010 California budget crisis by allowing the state to regulate and tax its sale at $50 per ounce.[22] According to Time, California tax collectors estimate the bill would raise about $1.3 billion a year in revenue.

Critics such as John Lovell, lobbyist for the California Peace Officers' Association, argue that too many people already struggle with alcohol and drug abuse, and legalizing another mind-altering substance would lead to a "surge" of use, making problems worse.[22] Apart from helping the state's budget by enforcing a tax on the sale of cannabis, proponents of the bill argue that legalization will reduce the amount of criminal activity associated with the drug. Orange County Superior Court Judge James Gray estimates that eliminating arrests, prosecutions, and imprisonment for nonviolent offenders due to legalization could save the state $1 billion a year.[22]

The bill was delayed until January 2010, when the Assembly Public Safety Committee approved the bill on a 4 to 3 vote—this marked the first time in United States history that a bill legalizing marijuana passed a legislative committee.[6] However, the bill was unable to move forward to the Health Committee, where it was required to be heard before reaching the Assembly floor, before the January 15 deadline for proposed 2009 legislation. Ammiano plans to re-introduce the bill later this month or wait to see how a ballot measure for legalization fares in November 2010.[6]

There were three separate marijuana related initiatives put forth to qualify for the November 2010 elections. Two of these failed to gather the required number of signatures.

On March 24, 2010 California Proposition 19, titled the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act, qualified for the November ballot for the State of California.[8] If it had passed, this initiative would have legalized marijuana in California and allowed local governments to tax and regulate the sale of marijuana and its related activities.[9] However, the proposal was defeated by a narrow margin during the November 2 election
 
Last edited:

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
Eh depends on how much time I have to do it and how it is being used. Plus how many people are using it too. Lots of factors
Yeah bong + sharing is caring - tolerance = Happy Aids for at least a month. If you are buzzing through 2.5oz a month, you might need to take some time off and get your tolerance down, then buy a P and call it great.
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
42
Location
Maine
Yeah bong + sharing is caring - tolerance = Happy Aids for at least a month. If you are buzzing through 2.5oz a month, you might need to take some time off and get your tolerance down, then buy a P and call it great.
Haha not going through that much that's for sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: u_cant_c_me

Nick

New Member
Joined
May 2, 2013
Messages
7,756
Reaction score
2,182
Points
3
Age
26
Why can't they just legalize it already? Saying it doesn't harm in any way (whether it be the brain or the lungs) isn't true, but it's certainly less harmful than alcohol and tobacco. It should be regulated already and be legal for recreational use, I still don't understand why it's not.