Battle Royal Title?

[John]

Now I've heard some people talk about this and it could be as good idea. but not a 20 man battle royal, maybe a triple threat/ fatal fourway or even a single match. Maybe even put this title on ECW to help get ratings, or maybe on smakdown to prove to Vince and raw that they can be as good as raw on any given day. Or maybe even at ppv's 5 stars from each show are selected to go and fight for the title and then at the next show the champion and the gm's pick another 15 to fight the champion for the title. what do you think? good idea or not?

 

[rosewt01]

No, I jhate the idea, it is stupid. A Battle Royal Title, even the name ruins it.

 

[CT Styles]

No way. I hate it. Why would 14 superstars sacrifice a PPV match to watch one guy win a stupid pointless title? I don't know where this idea came from but I hate it. If they want another title on ECW make it the ECW TV title. A battle royal title sounds stupid. If they had that why not a TLC title? A Ladder Match Title? A Tables Match Title? A Casket Match Title? Winning a battle royal is an achievement usually to get a title shot or something special. You don't need a title to say that.

 

[★Chuck Zombie★]

The Small Show: It was a "Battle Royal" title. You see, it would be this title that would be defended... but only in a battle royal match!

Michael Bolton: That's the worst idea I've ever heard in my life, TSS.

Samir: Yes, this is horrible, this idea.

 

[eggthief]

I would rather have the 6 man hell in a cell match for the title again, now that would be sweet.

 

[noumenon]

Ugh, hell no. Wouldn't a title suggesting that the person holding it could beat 10...15...20 people...whatever it is... at a time would be better than the WWE and WHC champion?

 

[MikeRaw]

I dont like this idea.

Firstly, you said yove heard talk about that? WTF, where was I? lol

Secondly, it would obviously just be another mid card title, because theres enough world titles.

And with it being a mid card title, why would we bring in another title when the IC title division is already shit. Theres no need for another title.

And also, as far as it always bein gjust for battle royals? I dont like that, because theres no prestige in that. It just doesnt seem like a point to have a battle royal title IMO.

 

[Kaedon]

Yeah no.

 

[Bigfella]

How about a

'First you must win the royal rumble, defeat the old champion in a street fight at No Way Out, Win the Title at Wrestle mania, Job to Santonio, Drop the Title to a Midget and go to TNA' Title

 

[comicgeekelly]

The only way that this could work is if they just had it defended at the 4 big PPV's and used it to give people who don't have matches a paycheck. Even then it might still suck.

 

[monkeystyle]

Does it hurt when you come up with your threads?

 

[OsamaHussian]

There's already 9 Championships in WWE, no need to have another (stupid and pointless) title such as this... no: