C4
Guest
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Yeh it looks like a shot out of a porno he may have/may not have been in.
I'm also really not feeling the arrows, what's with that? They're too illuminous for the rest of the sig, imo. I'd also be feeling the 'widescreen' effect you've got going, or seem to be pulling for, if it was enforced more. Right now it's there, but the bottom half isn't showing through and it ruins it, a little. You need a proper border, on that note. The text is somewhat interesting, and I can see how that would work with the arrows, giving a real 'neon light' look to it. I can see how a change in text would work, but it's not necessary. Also, the second 'batista' below the first is a little redundant.
the effect on the whole sig, the bg, the brushes are pretty cool. With a better choice in picture on the left, it would look really good. As for the single brush, the lighting effect on the right picture, id say that needs to be larger, or moved up over his face a little more. The fact that one eye is still in the dark just doesn't look good, and I think the 'intensity in his eyes' is not being portrayed through the visibility of just one eye. I think that's just something that needs to go with this sig, unless it's a rip-off in which case you're far off, lol.
Just my thoughts though.
I'm also really not feeling the arrows, what's with that? They're too illuminous for the rest of the sig, imo. I'd also be feeling the 'widescreen' effect you've got going, or seem to be pulling for, if it was enforced more. Right now it's there, but the bottom half isn't showing through and it ruins it, a little. You need a proper border, on that note. The text is somewhat interesting, and I can see how that would work with the arrows, giving a real 'neon light' look to it. I can see how a change in text would work, but it's not necessary. Also, the second 'batista' below the first is a little redundant.
the effect on the whole sig, the bg, the brushes are pretty cool. With a better choice in picture on the left, it would look really good. As for the single brush, the lighting effect on the right picture, id say that needs to be larger, or moved up over his face a little more. The fact that one eye is still in the dark just doesn't look good, and I think the 'intensity in his eyes' is not being portrayed through the visibility of just one eye. I think that's just something that needs to go with this sig, unless it's a rip-off in which case you're far off, lol.
Just my thoughts though.
seX-Power
Guest
The background and brushes are pretty good, but the sig is ruined by the half-way-through-orgasm Batista and the out-of-place neon text.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2007
- Messages
- 976
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 32
- Location
- Montreal, Quebec, Canada
the text honestly kills it. It would be an awesome sig without it, it doesn't fight with the whole grungy feeling of the sig itself. This sig would actually look nice with no text. I really like the strip u did that goes across Batistas face. And its nice to see your experimenting and trying new things.
Kizza
Guest
Left Batista looks like he's getting a blow job tbh. The text looks pretty bad, I don't see why you added the smaller Batista text under it. It could also be placed somewhere better in the sig.
C4
Guest
CT Styles
Guest
I really don't like it.
I hate the blending and choice of psds. They're blended in too much to the picture and because of the added noise in it, it looks awful.
I hate the blending and choice of psds. They're blended in too much to the picture and because of the added noise in it, it looks awful.