Are the tables turning against Kane?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Doomsday

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
378
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
Earth
Paul Bearer was last seen being buried alive in wet cement by the Undertaker.
Now he's back... preceptiably in Undertaker's corner.
What does "The Father of Destruction"'s return mean for this feud?
What does the return of the Undertaker's Urn mean?
and most importantly...
What happens next?
 

imported_Adam

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
982
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Location
IN YOUR HEAD! HULKAMANIACS!
Maybe Bearer could betray Taker again like way back when and allow Kane to get the victory? It kinda bugs me that Kane was the one who brought Bearer and then he sided with Taker though, just kinda weird.
 

Doomsday

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
378
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
Earth
Paul Bearer is a name for one who assists in carrying of the deceased inside of their casket.
Undertaker is one who buries the casket.

Kane is hawaiian for male.
 

imported_Adam

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
982
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Location
IN YOUR HEAD! HULKAMANIACS!
^With that knowledge, (If that is really what Paul Bearer is meant to mean), then Kane sounds like he doesn't belong lol. Maybe they should change his name to Mordecai or The Grim Reaper? Just kidding.
 

noumenon

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
717
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
39
Location
Long Island, NY
Either the extremely predictable route of the tables turning and Taker coming out on top... or preferably Bearer turning on Taker and siding with Kane. He's done a great job with his title reign and it would really be a shame to see it come to an end so soon. Have him really run with this for a bit and use a young talent to knock him off the the top a month or two down the line.
 

imported_Adam

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
982
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Location
IN YOUR HEAD! HULKAMANIACS!
^Who do you think could be this young new talent? Im just a bit unclear on whether you mean someone who is a former champ and hasn't held it in a while (CM Punk or JSwagger) or someone whos new and hasn't held alot if any titles (Del Rio or MVP).
 

...god...

Active Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
1,671
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
34
100% agree with Rob. They can do the absolute predictable shit and just have Undertaker beat and retire Kane, once again coming out on top like always. Or, just have Kane COMPLETELY go over in this feud, fuck, just make it a loser leaves SD and make him go to Raw to set up the inevitable Cena feud.
 

Beer

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
41
Location
Wales, the land of beer and sheep.
we can all dream. Undertaker NEVER loses feuds, and I don't see him ever losing a feud unless he loses to Cena at Mania.

EDIT: that's not to say kane won't win the match, it's just he won't win the feud overall.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
1,407
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
I'm with the rest of you. I've grown so cynical at how Undertaker never TRULY puts anybody over. If there's anybody that should retire the Undertaker, it's Kane, and it should be at SURVIVOR SERIES, that way, it would be a nice, even 20 years, and the streak would stay intact. But of course, we all know he's going to go to Mania this year and job to Cena.

Also, Kane needs to run with the title, until at LEAST Royal Rumble. PLEASE.
 

Axis

Active Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
He put Brock Lesnar over.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
Lol @ people thinking Taker doesn't put people over. Lesnar, Hardy, Edge. You don't need to lose the feud to put some one over. Taker is probably the most over guy in the sense that if he puts you over or makes you look good, that does more to elevate your career than anything the E can do for you, sans squashing Cena.

LMFAO at people thinking Taker needs to retire. GTFO. He's earned everything he has and no one on the internet is in any position to tell this guy to hang them up. Who the fuck told Kareem to hang them up? No one. Taker is the motherfucking Kareem of the WWE, he can do whatever the fuck he wants, because A: he's still better than 90% of the guys beneath him. B: HE DRAWS FUCKING MONEY. C: He's been loyal to this place for 20 years and done everything asked of him.

And Gates, do you like anyone that has ever drawn a nickel in this business? It seems every post from you is : Triple H needs to die, that Jew prick. HBK is going to come back to hog all the glory like it's 1996 again. Or Taker needs to die already, that old fuck. I'd understand a little if every non-legend bash fest from you wasn't Kofi B Ware needs to die. McIntyre looks queer. Or Cena is gay and played out. Seriously, do you like anything? What would you do to make money in Vince's place? You do know that's the idea of running any business, right? To make money, right? People like you would run any company they touch into the ground because they think they know what's wrong with something but have no fucking clue how to improve something.
 

Lady Redfield

Itchy tasty
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
6,482
Reaction score
3,125
Points
118
Location
Raccoon City
Favorite Sports Team
RRzOmtg
Cool that Bearer is back. Thing is, the younger generation missed the time when Taker and Bearer were a million times more awesome.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
1,407
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
Lol @ people thinking Taker doesn't put people over. Lesnar, Hardy, Edge. You don't need to lose the feud to put some one over. Taker is probably the most over guy in the sense that if he puts you over or makes you look good, that does more to elevate your career than anything the E can do for you, sans squashing Cena.

LMFAO at people thinking Taker needs to retire. GTFO. He's earned everything he has and no one on the internet is in any position to tell this guy to hang them up. Who the fuck told Kareem to hang them up? No one. Taker is the motherfucking Kareem of the WWE, he can do whatever the fuck he wants, because A: he's still better than 90% of the guys beneath him. B: HE DRAWS FUCKING MONEY. C: He's been loyal to this place for 20 years and done everything asked of him.

And Gates, do you like anyone that has ever drawn a nickel in this business? It seems every post from you is : Triple H needs to die, that Jew prick. HBK is going to come back to hog all the glory like it's 1996 again. Or Taker needs to die already, that old fuck. I'd understand a little if every non-legend bash fest from you wasn't Kofi B Ware needs to die. McIntyre looks queer. Or Cena is gay and played out. Seriously, do you like anything? What would you do to make money in Vince's place? You do know that's the idea of running any business, right? To make money, right? People like you would run any company they touch into the ground because they think they know what's wrong with something but have no fucking clue how to improve something.

You're defending the WWE like you're 12 years old. What's wrong with you?
 

Wordlife

Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
Chicago, IL
With the addition of Bearer in his corner, it seems pretty obvious this will be the last title reign that Undertaker will have before he retires in the coming years.