Another show or one 2 hour show?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Basically what the thread title is. Would you rather have TNA make Impact! a 2 hour show, or debut another show? Both have their pros and cons. With another show TNA can showcase their stars that have been underused (Petey, Kaz and alot of the X-Division guys)...

thoughts?
 

ImpactAngle

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
37
Location
Belgium
Personally I think a 2 hour show would be more solid and I hope those underused talents will be given an opportunity as soon as possible. TNA should not try to be another WWE or even worse a new WCW, wasting young gifted athletes. If TNA management wants their product to be another version of the competition, then the company will slowly collapse. Imitation kills progress.
 

xtremebadass

Guest
XPlosion used to air on FSN Florida, or SUN, I remeber watchin it like maybe a yr ago.

I want 2 separate shows, I don't think I can sit and watch 2 hrs of TNA anyways.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
^^ lol at that comment, I guess Impact! is that bad for ya?

well, im gonna answer my own thread and say I would rather have 1 show that is 2 hours long. Impact! has been struggling to put over PPVs well so that people actually buy them, but with 2 hours not only will more wrestlers that have been underused, get pushes, but TNA can actually increase their PPV buyrates a little
 

KENNEDY412

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
36
I really am not seeing much of a difference except maybe if they do two shows the mid carders wont be used as much, because they might just use the same people to main event both shows but with a two hour show they cant really do that so they would have to push the mid cards and yound people that deserve to be on tv and get a push
 

dstebbins

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
465
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
35
I find it to be rather simple. One 2hr show. Seriously, think about it.

1. If TNA gets a seperate 1hr show, do you honestly think they'll use it as a heat/velocity equal? No. They'll use it the same way that WWE used Smackdown before the brands split up. With a 2hr show, they almost have to use at least the first thirty minutes for mid-card pushes.

2. With only 1hr at a time, their matches can't be as long. Last week had just one match, and while it was a good match, there was nothing else. With one 2hr show, you can have matches as good as that every week WITHOUT sacrifing the rest of the show.

To me, there's no contest.