Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    I don't think anyone said that so I don't know where you got that from. He was being compared to Austin and as far as talent and longevity its not even close for me. BTW this is a Stone Cold/Hogan thread so lets stay on topic.
  2. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    Do you think? I would say that the match structure in WWF at the time was far more disorganized than in WCW. It was from 99 onwards where things changed IMO.
  3. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    Not saying it matters how you get over, what I am saying is that to stay on top and be over for a long period you need to be a good all rounder. Yes, WCW dropped the ball with Goldberg , but if he was good enough then he would have recovered and had a long and glittering career, and I don't...
  4. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    Because the way WCW pushed him with the whole streak, the length of most of his matches, and the booking of most of his matches working to his power based was a big factor in him getting over so strong. He did what he had to do well, but I don't think he was ever an all rounder like Austin that...
  5. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    Not sure about that. No doubt WCW dropped the ball with Goldberg, but he did have more limits than Austin, and I think over time he would have been exposed.
  6. Keith

    Who was the bigger star?

    Hogan because of his break out appeal outside of wrestling and also the first boom period lasted longer than Austin's. Austin for talent and the character would have got my vote, but Hogan was bigger.
Top Bottom