Search results
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
-
Raw Thread June 11
I like rationalizing WWE's shitty writing in my head with acceptable headcannons that keep kayfabe -
Raw Thread June 11
New Day are the longest tag team champions in wwe history no? Does it matter which of the three tag belts they've held when they've held one longer than anyone else has held the other two? -
Raw Thread June 11
Prior to 2004 the only chance they would have had to "mix records" (you keep saying this like it implies a record actually disappears, brock was still the youngest wwe champion despite orton winning the whc younger, they just acknowledged orton was the youngest to win either) was from late 02... -
Raw Thread June 11
I think WWE actually acknowledged that they changed the definitions of triple crown and grand slam so now we just have new and old criteria but that's a whole other can of worms lmao -
Raw Thread June 11
I've said multiple times I don't care, I'm just saying they aren't wrong and I mean we care bc it's still impressive? We cared when Punk was having that long reign not because he was gonna break the record but bc it was impressive so they added a qualifier to it to show that while it wasn't... -
Raw Thread June 11
I know when Orton won the WHC they acknowledged that he passed Brock as youngest world champion despite Brock gaining the record by winning the WWE title -
Raw Thread June 11
No because they're saying world championships can't be compared for some reason that's the whole problem -
Raw Thread June 11
It's literally a fact though lol WWE always does this like how they always billed JBL as the longest reigning wwe champ in smackdown history, like why do I give a fuck about that? But that doesn't make it any less true. I'm not arguing if the reign is better or worse or what should be... -
Raw Thread June 11
Brock Lesnar is the longest reigning world champion in WWE since the 1980s. Is that better? -
Raw Thread June 11
I didn't think semantics was this big of an issue lol let's say hypothetically Brock holds this dsmn belt until he passes Bruno's title run, would it upset you so much if they called him the longest reigning world champion ever? Because he would be and it's the same "mixing belts" thing you... -
Raw Thread June 11
Oops I edited my post after you quoted it but go back and read what i said to add and let me stress again ITS NOT A REAL RECORD it's just a fact, like a little fun fact that isn't causing very much fun here -
Raw Thread June 11
None of that changes the FACT that Brock is the longest reigning world champion since the 80s though lol like do you disagree with that at all? Bc it sounds like you just disagree with how WWE presents it No ones saying he broke a WWE championship record at all bruh but since there's been so... -
Raw Thread June 11
Yeah Punk was the longest reigning WWE Champion in the modern era which therefore made him the longest reigning world champion of it too bc no WHC had a longer reign. Brock is the longest reigning universal champion ever obviously and now he's also the longest reigning world champion of this... -
Raw Thread June 11
Yeah like when they would call JBL the longest reigning WWE Champion in SmackDown history like I was supposed to care about that :TI: -
Raw Thread June 11
Bruh what are you guys on? By that logic Punk had no record ever bc Bruno held that championship longer than him. They always said Punk's "record" was longest world champion in the modern era, see how arbitrary most of that is? They grouped both world titles together then and what even...