Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. WWE Television Ratings

    B/C I'm hitting on 5 or 6 points that I want to get out, and not cloud it in my business and financial analysis, which you are waiting to infract me on. I have been scorned for educating posters on how public companies work, so I am trying to remain simple so people wont get mad at me being the...

  2. WWE Television Ratings

    Tweeking Cena's chatacter would be like plugging one leak in the boat when there is 5 leaks still spewing. The boat needs an entire new bottom. WWE will have to transition from PG, to TV 14 this year. While 2013 needs to ease in to TV MA. They have lost veiwers B/C they are not growing with...

  3. WWE Television Ratings

    My dude, I just diagnosed the problem, I didn't create it. And The WWE is going to have to go all in on ONE direction. You can't gear a TV drama series towards 2 seperate audiences. 1)5-13 (Cena) 2)18-29 (Rock) 3)Casuals (Rock) 4)IWC (Punk) Moving to "TV MA" will gear your product...

  4. WWE Television Ratings

    Cena is losing veiwers B/C the 18-29 demo can not stand him. And Punk is losing veiwers B/C the IWC doesnt make up more than 15 to 20% of the total veiwers. And when WM season is in full swing, after the RR, and the part time veiwers start coming back, and buying tickets the events, It's going...

  5. WWE Television Ratings

    And that bar show as well, forgot the name. But the good news is, the WWE can allways draw on that core of 5 million, even though 500,000 have left. My hunch is that come March, those million will be back watching in full and shows like "Pawn Star" and the other Bar show, will become stale and...

  6. WWE Television Ratings

    Well you can't on one hand talk about how much more "entertaining" the WWE has been with Punk, and at the same time say the writing sucks. Either the writing sucks or the product is entertaining. Which is it? If the writing sucks, then by virtue of that alone, CM Punk can not succeed. But I...

  7. WWE Television Ratings

    Not the entire truth. WWE in total has lost a half million viewers since Punk's mid summer rise. And his championship reign has resulted in week by week drops, untill 3 weeks ago. But he has draw more 2.8's and 2.9's as percentage of house holds watching, than any WWE champ since 1997. And in...

  8. WWE Television Ratings

    Well, SD it's self is a better put together product than Raw, also it is more consistant, and it doesn't go through 2 months of great booking, followed by 2 months of horrible booking. So veiwers remain as steady as the product. Also, it went through a long period of veiwership gains while Raw...
Top Bottom