Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. The 2016 Brand Split Discussion Thread

    I still think it's too soon to make a judgment on the rosters. SD can still bomb Raw in quality. Don't know til we see. Sent from my LGL16C using Tapatalk

  2. The 2016 Brand Split Discussion Thread

    In terms of making it look like a real competition between two brands, it's probably not going to turn out looking like that. But there could be other benefits that I guess we just gotta watch to see play out. Sent from my LGL16C using Tapatalk

  3. The 2016 Brand Split Discussion Thread

    I totally get your point. I just always assumed Raw was going to be first, I guess since it is more important. It would be a nice touch to have a competition for it though, or even just a coin flip. In the point of things being "fair "too it would make sense for SD to get the first pick since...

  4. The 2016 Brand Split Discussion Thread

    Haha they're not, as far as I know. I could buy the Raw before SD on the calendar though, makes as much sense as Raw getting 3 picks for 3 hours and SD getting 2 for 2 hours. Sent from my LGL16C using Tapatalk

  5. The 2016 Brand Split Discussion Thread

    Monday comes before Thursday. So they get the pick first. Raw was on TV before Smackdown. Hell, men in WWE are gentlemen so Steph gets "ladies first" treatment. Weak reasons but they're ideas. Sent from my LGL16C using Tapatalk
Top Bottom