Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. The vignette from Raw...

    Okay, I will do it. You're lying.

  2. The vignette from Raw...

    Depends on your definition of "original." Given that he's a WCW guy and was globally famous before coming to TNA, I would argue that he's not an "original." Regardless, that is logical, and your point is over what TNA is going to do, so throw what I said out the window. Fact of the matter is...

  3. The vignette from Raw...

    If this was a year ago, I would have actually rather seen Sting vs Michaels, but maybe that's just me. Plus that's impossible now. Sting vs Cena, Sting vs Triple H, Sting vs Punk, and maybe Sting vs Big Show appeal to me. I would not want to see him mixing it up with midcarders. And I do not...

  4. The vignette from Raw...

    Those "people" are also the ones who have "reported" Undertaker vs Kane, Undertaker vs Wade Barrett, Undertaker vs Sheamus, Undertaker vs Lesnar, and Undertaker vs John Cena all for Wrestlemania 27. These guys make shit up so that idiots buy into it and give traffic to their sites. They know no...

  5. The vignette from Raw...

    I figure it's somebody new that they're hyping, which is weird because they usually save that for after Wrestlemania. My first thought was Undertaker, but they would probably (1) have said his name, and (2) put it on Smackdown. Some people don't understand that it physically can't be Sting. My...
Top Bottom