Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    Before you were saying that one of the reasons TNA was better than WWE is because of the fact Jeff Hardy was heel and could feud with the big faces.

  2. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    Potential feuds that may be bad. Again you're assuming that because Jeff is interesting as a heel and you pair him up with a big face they will have a good feud with good matches.

  3. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    ^ hahaha Just because something is interesting doesn't mean it is good. Studying history I found the holocaust pretty interesting but that definitely (in most eyes >.>) wasn't a good thing.

  4. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    DiBiase isn't good enough to be a midcard staple either. Pretty much all midcarders in the WWE atm are more interesting and wrestle better. By the way, the heat you heard him getting in Legacy was thanks to Randy Orton and so was whatever mediocre face pops he was getting during their conflicts.

  5. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    DiBiase was never good. He was better than Rhodes when he debuted but Rhodes has improved more than anyone else in the company in the last few years and DiBiase has always gone downhill. He was boring in Legacy and what gimmick he could have in singles competition has never been properly...

  6. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    DiBiase is rather horrid. Why should he be pushed? As for the rest of the post, I agree with the part about the tag division but when it all comes down to it the WWE being better in every way may be an exaggeration but 90% of people would still call it superior to TNA and not even really close...

  7. Are you serious? (Decided to watch TNA tonight)

    When something is pretty much better than another thing in almost every single way and you favour it, then I'm pretty sure it's not being biased.
Top Bottom