Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Hidden Blaze

    People were saying my reasons for liking TNA more then WWE were dumb but get this

    at least you admit his opinions are stupid lol. :unsure: anyway yeahhhhhhhhh bye
  2. Hidden Blaze

    People were saying my reasons for liking TNA more then WWE were dumb but get this

    Also according to him if being around longer makes it better Nascar > WWE Nascar been around since 1948 where WWE been around since 1952 I'm just using this person logic that no one seemed to put down.
  3. Hidden Blaze

    People were saying my reasons for liking TNA more then WWE were dumb but get this

    So I'm the stupid one even thought someone says WWE is better and there reasons are stupid. Yet no one rips in to the guy cause its saying WWE is better. Like I said WWE MARKS.
  4. Hidden Blaze

    People were saying my reasons for liking TNA more then WWE were dumb but get this

    ok so that is the only thing what about the fact he said they been around longer. Just because something has been around longer does not make it better. If so Orton > Morrison which wait no that is true. Hogan > Morrison which isn't true.
  5. Hidden Blaze

    People were saying my reasons for liking TNA more then WWE were dumb but get this

    ok ok..I was over at that forum WWE has and someone asked who likes both..one guy said WWE has WRESTLEMANIA tna doesn't WWE been around for a long time tna hasn't WWE has 9 titles tna has four WWE has three shows ( RAW, ECW, Smackdown) tna is only tna so by the looks...
Top Bottom