Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    Riiigght. I seriously hope you are kidding because that would be the only guys in the entire organization. They cannot afford the asking prices of those people. I'm not necessarily speaking of you, but I love how people seem to think wrestling organizations have an infinite amount of money...

  2. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    Undertaker does not own his name. It is all owned by WWE. Hulk Hogan may own the name "Hogan", or it is common enough that it doesn't matter, but Marvel comics and Stan Lee own the name "Hulk"

  3. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    No, he does not own the name. It is under trademark by the WWE. Vince McMahon currently rents the name out to the Rock for $1 a year.

  4. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    What name would he use in TNA if say they were to use him?

  5. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    Smartest thing anybody's said in this thread. Glad I thought of it :shifty:

  6. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    That's a pretty stupid statement. It makes no difference who brings in who.

  7. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    Don't you dare bring Ric Flair into this, he still has more talent than most of the roster.

  8. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    For like 3 or 4 shows until people realise its still same shit different day. Not to mention folks he wouldn't be able to use the name the Rock anyway. Which is purely asthetic, but still makes a minor difference.

  9. TNA in MAJOR NEW SIGNING TALKS AND I MEAN MAJOR

    I understand the reasoning behind why he would wish to do such a thing, but the reason I don't believe this is because generally magazines like that are kayfabe magazines and are 99% bullshit as it is. Until I see it reported on the torch or the observer, I'm not buying it.
Top Bottom