Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Amount/Quality of Wrestling...NOT THE PROBLEM

    Yeah, theres no question they're growing. And to the guy who had trouble finding DVD's-watch ROH online. There's tons of past main events, and mid card matches on google video. On top of that, theres the ROH video wire which gives a look at current storylines, so check it out. And as a...

  2. Amount/Quality of Wrestling...NOT THE PROBLEM

    Okay, you made a typo, thats fine. I just thought you were a noob and just wanted to mention that theres more than 2 promotions out there. I've just never heard anyone say that WWE puts on better wrestling than ROH, thats all.

  3. Amount/Quality of Wrestling...NOT THE PROBLEM

    Well you may find it more enteraining, but to call WWE wrestling "better" than ROH and a lot of other companies just isn't true. There a huge difference. My guess is that you havn't seen too many matches outside WWE and TNA but thats just my estimate.

  4. Amount/Quality of Wrestling...NOT THE PROBLEM

    Excuse me? WWE is the best wrestling today?? With all due respect, are you on crack? Ok so you said TNA sucks, fine...but what about everyone else? ROH not getting attention? Dude, the'yre an Indy company (well super Indy company) without a TV deal, yet have the most dedicated fans in...

  5. Amount/Quality of Wrestling...NOT THE PROBLEM

    It was the characters, storylines, and unique personalities that made the Attitude Era so succesful. I'm sorry to anyone that disagrees, but mainstream wrestling WAS better back then. Nothing was forced down anyones throats. The fans chose who they wanted to lead the company. Actually, one...
Top Bottom