Search results
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
-
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Are you seriously Blue? I underlined quite clearly why I think Rollins is not the right choice. Again. - He has little physical presence or aura. He doesn't make me believe. - He is terrible on the mic and has an annoying voice. - He has little potential to draw back the casual audience. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
I have said why Rollins vs Brock does nothing for me. I can suspend my disbelief. You have to with wrestling. But Rollins doesn't make me believe. He doesn't carry himself like a star or a bad ass. He comes across as a mid-carder. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
What is "phycology"? I fail to see how Brock vs Rollins has a great story to it. Brock vs Braun's matches are much more realistic and hard-hitting. I can't take Rollins seriously against Brock. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Their matches were fine. They had unfinished business as well. Braun beating Brock clean at Wrestlemania would have been great. What's so special about Brock vs Rollins? -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
It's feud. Not "fued". The best story is the one that has the potential to make the most money. Simple. Brock vs Braun is a feud that features two monsters beating the crap out of one another. It does more for me than Brock vs Rollins. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
I must be wrong on this occasion then. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Not really. Braun was a better option. As was Lashley. A Brock vs Lashley match could be great if it was booked properly. Really though. There weren't many good options. It's a weak era for marketable talent. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Why are you obsessed with Owen Hart? -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Scott Steiner and Ken Shamrock had physical presence. Not because they were tall, but because you knew they would beat the crap out of you. Rollins doesn't have that. He's a hipster with a nerdy voice. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
I don't believe everything he says. I think he underrated Goldberg, for example. But he's a credible source for research. The RAW ratings from 1995 was taken from a newspaper article. You really are dumb aren't you? -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Who says height is the only thing that matters? That's a strawman. It does matter, for sure. But it's not the only thing that I value. Rollins is terrible on the mic and doesn't have any aura. He doesn't have any physical presence either. Despite his height. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
I like how nerds say "fuck casual fans". They are the fans that WWE want. Because there are loads of them. Only people with no lives are hardcore wrestling fans. You know, that small portion of geeks that watch everything. WWE need to find someone who brings the casual audience back full-time... -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
So you are not going to debunk any points then. Oh and I am 6 ft 2. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
More people know him than Seth Rollins. -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
- Pure conjecture that it was Nash's idea. You just don't like him. - Source - - Source - - Well Beniot, Malenko, Eddie and Saturn were a little band of midgets in WCW. Just because Graham was short it doesn't mean he was wrong does it? Eddie later became a much more well-rounded... -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
This week's RAW rating was down 20 % on last year. It featured Rollins' return. Smackdown was also down 15% year on year. Yet, other sports' ratings are up year on year. Lynch and Rollins are currently tanking the ratings. I give Lynch credit as she is a good performer. But Rollins is out of... -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
- Nash didn't book himself to win the title over Goldberg. That's a myth. - RAW set ratings records during periods when Nash was champion. In particular the average between March of 1995 until June of 1995 was the highest in the show's history up until that point. Despite Nash being booked... -
-
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Those promotions have only a small niche audience. They make up around 10% of WWE's audience. Most people who turn off WWE stop watching wrestling. They don't watch those promotions. Most don't know what NOAH or New Japan is. Not everyone has smarky tastes. I.E - small wrestlers, indie... -
Seth Rollins is the wrong choice.
Bryan's merchandise sales were nothing special. Cena was a bigger draw than Reigns. I would never say otherwise. Smackdown's ratings have tumbled since Bryan returned last year. For the first time they have sunk below 2 million. Bryan is partially to blame.