Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep. He needed something new, and I think a feud with Morrison could be good. Christian losing the title so quickly.

  2. WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep. If it would've happened, it would have been with a relatively incapable Hogan, since he'd have been old as hell. The fact that we got Hogan vs. The Rock should be good enough for people. Owen Hart never winning the world title

  3. WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep: I don't see how he was screwed. I thought he got too quick of a push as it is. And it's not like WWE had any idea that he was going to be forced to retire a week and change after Wrestlemania. Speaking of ADR... ADR getting an immediate push upon his arrival.

  4. WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change/Keep - I kinda go both ways on this one. I can deal with keeping it, because he was damn impressive and didn't get an immediate huge push (ala Del Rio) by beating a huge star. I can also understand changing it depending how big of a push they intend on giving him. And given that he took...

  5. WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep: I haven't watched it yet (I have it DVR'd), but it can't be any worse than the trash they've been calling NXT recently. WWE Booking a Rock vs. Cena main event at WM28 a year in advance.
Top Bottom