Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    The key is - you don't actually have to do it. But you can do it if you want to. This problem is based on only needing solve one element of the problem - showing intent. Looking for a way to not drink it, is actually the trap.
  2. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    A key part of a contract being valid - is always intention. It one of the main reasons they exist, even as vows for stuff like marriage.
  3. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    Going to have to agree to disagree on that point.
  4. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    No you sign the contract at midnight - signing it on the dot. Means you show intention exactly at midnight.
  5. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    Sounds like the goal posts have moved to me. I am claiming this as a pass.
  6. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    The contract is for drinking - but the bet is for intention. The bet is never changed. The contract simply proves intention
  7. CakeWalker

    The Great Debate: Kavka's Toxin Puzzle

    A Billionaire makes a bet with you to drink a non-lethal poison. He will pay you a million dollars Tomorrow Morning as long as you Intend at Midnight Tonight to drink the poison Tomorrow Afternoon. As long as you Intend at midnight to drink the poison, you don't actually have to drink it because...
Top Bottom