Wrestling Forum - Wrestling News, Views & Reviews | WrestlingSmarks.com
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
David "The Hoff" Hasselhoff - as Michael - in the '80s hit television series Knight Rider, is introduced to the Knight 2000 (KITT) for the first time!What do...
In principle - without actually knowing any example or cases, I do think bans or violations on one forum, shouldn't carry over to another. More so because it sets a precedent for the future, especially considering a considerable number of people on Smarks had been banned from other sites previously.
My comment is just about principles and precedents, and obviously I can't nor should I comment on anything that took place on a site I wasn't on. Also didn't realise how many comments were in this chain.
@Juice But see, it doesn't really set a precedent. This wasn't something that was automatic. We discussed his status and behavior with the whole staff immediately after WWEF was purchased. The vile behavior of this person, it was unanimous that he shouldn't be unbanned. THat is how reprehensible it was. If a precedent was set, then that precedent is that we discuss the bans and decide based on merit whether or not they should be lifted.
I understand what you are saying, but my comment is simply about principles and precedents of Wrestling Smarks, rather than focusing on individual examples. Not looking to start a disagreement or anything, as I have no idea what happened on a previous site.
In very simplistic terms though, there is no difference - if we don't focus on individual examples. If that makes sense? I'm literally just talking principles and precedents. I won't comment again on this though, because my original first sentence still holds true - if we don't refer to individual examples.
@Vampire Quinn it is because of some things he said directly to some people which were totally inappropriate and threatening. Trrust me when I say it is very deserved
The only three people who really know the whole extent of what happened are he, me and Jeff because I allowed him to read the emails I received from him. I don't think it's necessary to go into detail about them, just trust me from what you know about me that I made the best decision.
K.I.T.T - Darth Vader's bathroom?