Paul Heyman reacts to Jeff Hardy storyline

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


The Shua

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
39
Location
Toronto Area
The Sun said:
WWE arrogantly displayed their inability to understand public perception with the ill-conceived 'Jeff Hardy has been hospitalised' storyline going to into the Survivor Series PPV this past Sunday.
I'm not here to judge whether the plot twist was in good taste or bad taste.

And to be blunt it would be rather hypocritical of me to point fingers about whether a storyline crossed any lines or boundaries.

Pro wrestling, or sports entertainment, is at its best when the emotions spill over and people stop thinking about ‘real v fake’ — and start caring about the next twist, turn and progression in the storyline.

The story of Hardy getting jumped in his hotel lead to Edge's return, which lead to Hardy accidentally knocking out Triple H with the chair, which in turn lead to HHH losing the WWE Title because of Hardy's actions in attempting to get revenge on his alleged assailant.

We got ourselves some interesting plot twists here!

Even better, Edge v HHH v Hardy is a Triple Threat match for the WWE title in which any man can emerge as champion. That's intriguing.

Lots of different scenarios can play out in this one. People are genuinely interested. Nothing wrong with that.

So, what was so wrong about the storyline?

Was it that WWE has blurred the line on its own in-house website, which is where news like Eddie Guerrero's death or the Chris Benoit family tragedy has been first broken?

Was it the eerie feeling some people had on the morning of a big show, hearing about a top star being found unconscious in a hotel, invoking memories of Eddie and even Brian Pillman?

We're back to the issue of 'taste'.

For some people, the manner in which WWE presented this storyline twist was just revolting.

The callous view taken by WWE chairman Vince McMahon and those around him, not even taking into account how brazenly insensitive this storyline may be viewed, is yet another in a long line of demonstrations by McMahon that getting people talking is paramount.

He feels that no rules apply because 'it's only entertainment' and people should embrace the soap opera-like enticements to stay tuned.

I think it was just bad business.

WWE made the conscious choice to present a scenario that called for speculation as to why the reportedly twice-suspended Hardy was found unconscious in his hotel.

Not once did WWE report the entire day 'Hardy was jumped by an unknown assailant' — that 'new information' was revealed only during the PPV broadcast.

To make matters worse, WWE acted like regional promoters in the 1970's, appearing to be almost giddy at the fact several mainstream news agencies picked up the story as legitimate.

"They're buying it as a shoot!" Whoopie!

This type of behaviour just leaves such a bad taste in the mouths of people who already look down on pro wrestling/sports entertainment.

I remember one time McMahon was so angry at me that his face turned neon purple because he was lamenting about the fact WWE draws so many people to their television shows, and yet the advertising rates for WWE programming are a percentage of what other shows, who don't have a comparable audience, can charge.

I made the statement that to mainstream advertisers, WWE fits in the category of 'low brow' and that to them, we'll always be served our Thanksgiving turkey out the back door.

Vince was furious with the statement.

"We're just like movies and every other form of entertainment," he bellowed. "What makes us less in anyone's eyes?"

The answer to Vince's question is: "The way the Jeff Hardy storyline was presented and carried out."

The omission of details of why Hardy was hospitalised, the obvious conclusion the fans reading the story could come to, and the fact WWE thought it was appropriate to leverage its good will to not immediately inform the inquiring media "this is just a storyline, like every other form of entertainment (ahem)" played into the hands of those who believe this is low brow, bottom feeding entertainment.

I don't personally view pro wrestling or WWE that way.

But this past Sunday, McMahon and his staff sure gave those critical of the industry all the ammunition they needed.

The worst part about it is the storyline would have been just as successful with just some safeguards in place to ensure WWE comes across as 'mainstream'.

Instead, World Wrestling Entertainment looked just like the billion dollar evolution of the old carnival rasslin' circuit.

Bravo, Paul Heyman. I, too, think the Jeff Hardy angle was done in bad taste. If they had simply said he was attacked backstage, fine....but they simply just said he was found passed out and then hospitalized. I agree with Heyman in that it was too eerily familiar, given how Guerrero was found, especially with everyone's knowledge of Jeff Hardy's drug history.

I guess there's no level too low for Vince to sink to.
 

eggthief

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Not to mention that the bitcHHH doesnt want to lose his title with a clean victory.
 

MikeRaw

Guest
This is stupid. it's a kayfabe website. When something legit happens, wwe clearly states it is not part of the show.
In this, it was as much a part of the storyline as when they say "Wat could Kane have in his bag?".
Also, Heyman is wrong. They announced that he was attacked well before the PPV. they gave it in their secondupdate at around 2 o clock.
Nothing wrong with what wwe did IMO.
 

Airfixx

Guest
Yay! I'm glad HHH is already shouldering part of the blame.


Well done Eggthief!
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
Not to mention that the bitcHHH doesnt want to lose his title with a clean victory.

Yeah, I guess the fact that every time Edge wins the title like this, and is called the 'Ultimate Opportunist' has nothing to do with the way Triple H lost.

I'm glad you know what happens in Hunter's mind though. Can you plz teach me how to mindread?
 

Moonlight Drive

Guest
The thing I think was stupid was everyone saying he can't compete and speaking for him, yet for some reason he is backstage?
 

Airfixx

Guest
Yeah, I guess the fact that every time Edge wins the title like this, and is called the 'Ultimate Opportunist' has nothing to do with the way Triple H lost.

I'm glad you know what happens in Hunter's mind though. Can you plz teach me how to mindread?


You know what I think? I think HHH was the one that actually devised the whole Edge character just so that there was a cheating opportunist around to save him from the 1-2-3 when the time comes to drop the belt.
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
Paul Heyman saying something is tasteless. Didnt he sign off on a crucifixion, beating of women before it became passe, and using a guys real life son for an angle? Yeah, I respect his knowledge and creative mind, but this is a completely moronic statement
 

kingovkings

Active Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
50
Location
ENGLAND UK
LMAO @ Airfixx well said :). But you should no by know HHH has mind conrol over everyone in the wwe ya know so he can have his own way and never get beat cleanly with a 1 2 3 ;).

I was only half way through reading the article when i thought some how HHH is going to be dragged in to this and blame pointed his way lol. So glad i wasn't let down ha ha. what's everyone going to do when trips isn't around to be blamed for everything ????.

Anyway i don't think it was in bad taste. When i read about it i instantly thought its a work plain and simple. Eddie Scenario never even entered my head tbh. nothing wrong with what they did IMO.
 

Soulpower

Guest
Kaedon..

And to be blunt it would be rather hypocritical of me to point fingers about whether a storyline crossed any lines or boundaries.

He is well aware of the fact that he's done tasteless angles in the past, doesn't mean he's not right though.
 

Airfixx

Guest
LMAO @ Airfixx well said :). But you should no by know HHH has mind conrol over everyone in the wwe


Not ONLY WWE.... Did you never wonder how you, I and others don't see through him and his politicising like all the 'smart' guys around?


droids.jpg


"These Aren't The Droids You're Looking For......"
 

kingovkings

Active Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
50
Location
ENGLAND UK
This is very true lol ;). What it most be like to be 'smart' hmmm i wonder. On second thoughts id rather be mind bended by HHH, HBK and there politicing ways lmao.