Mark Henry or Vader?

[kingbookersucka!]

Me and my brother like to compare wrestlers alot and we compared Mark Henry to Vader. I think Henry is overall better but he thinks Vader is. Who do you guys thing is overall a better wrestler?

 

[Paragon of Virtue]

both are absolutely rubbish in my mind. both keep falling over themselves when they wrestle. Henry would be better in my mind as he doesnt wrestle as much so not as much flab to see lol joke. serious now, vader got some people cheering, and they are both about the same i think as neither really got fans cheering or got any emotion.

 

[MikeRaw]

Mark Henry... I hated Vader, not in a heel sense, but a go the fuck away sense... Henry can at least make me hate him with heel heat, and hes decent on the mic, and average in the ring for a big man.

 

[PeepShow]

Comparing the two isn't even remotely fair. Vader wins this in a landslide.

 

[Wrestling Station]

yeah that goes to the Street Fight Section.

As to what this topic says i think Vader is better just coz he was a better monster than Henry

 

[OsamaHussian]

I agree with Peep, Vader was 10x better then Mark Henry...

both are absolutely rubbish in my mind. both keep falling over themselves when they wrestle. Henry would be better in my mind as he doesnt wrestle as much so not as much flab to see lol joke. serious now, vader got some people cheering, and they are both about the same i think as neither really got fans cheering or got any emotion.

What are you talking about? Vader was a monster heel in his prime. He was huge in Japan and imo, probably one of the best big men that has ever stepped foot inside a wrestling ring.

 

[Montana]

I still think Mark Henry is very underated, and his mic skills are much better than Vader, but Vader was the man back then. I'ma have to go with Vader.

 

[Y2Jasmine]

Vader is definitely better. He was the man in WCW and I fail to see a single thing good in Mark Henry. Vader had some great matches with Sting and I cannot remember anything good Henry did besides his run with the Nation, and his storyline with Mae Young.

 

[1chiban]

Vader was a believable main event heel. Mark henry is pretty believable as a bad dude granted, but Vader could work a great match at times. His stuff with Sting in WCW was brilliant if I recall.

 

[Airfixx]

Vader.

Reluctant to even go on, but c'mon the guy had a great moveset for a big man and came off like a real monster rather than 'a monster' (which in wrestling talk usually refers to any old big man).

When rating Vader, you gotta look at his whole career, not just his WWF run, which fell apart horribly...

Always thought they should have made a big deal out of Vader vs Taker (in the same way they did with Mankind).

 

[THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps]

Yeah, I don't mind Mark Henry, but imo definitely Vader. he was THE big man back then, and he legitimately came off as more of a monster. Henry is a monster, but not up to the standard of Vader by any means.

 

[Beer Money Army]

vader is Better......

mark henry isn't close...

Vader has very great series of Matches with ric Flair/Sting in WCW 92-94 time....

He didn't have the it Match.. but my favourite Vader Match in the WWE.. would Be V HBK Summerslam 96 or V undertaker (IYH Candaian Stampede 1997)..

I have seen some of his Japan work, it's good i wish i could get some more..

But all in all

Vader > Mark henry...

 

[Chuck Taylor's Grenade]

Vader. His matches with Cactus were brutal even by today's standards (the powerbomb on the concrete, the match in Germany when Cactus lost his ear). Plus he's probably the biggest person I've seen execute a moonsault.

 

[Moonlight Drive]

Vader without a shadow of a doubt. Like most people have pointed out, he could work great matches and was THE big man back in the day.

Plus I've never seen someone so huge execute a moonsault.

 

[CenaMark54]

Comparing the two isn't even remotely fair. Vader wins this in a landslide.

nuff said. I completely agree, its not close. Vader is one of the best big men ever imo.