The WWE Undisputed Championship **Must Read**

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Dylanfsd

Active Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,730
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
32
Location
Arizona
Please note that this took me about 3 days to think/write this out so feedback would be great.

To fully understand the pros and even the cons of bringing back the
Undisputed Title. You have to comprehend how we got to this point that we are currently at in the World Wrestling Entertainment. So let me take you back many, many years ago.

As we all know, the WWE Championship wasn't always the WWE Championship. It was originally known as the World Wide Wrestling Federation World Heavyweight Championship. Almost 35 years ago back in 1971, the WWWF rejoined the National Wrestling Alliance (NWA) and the Title was downgraded in status to become simply the WWWF Heavyweight Title. After almost a decade in 1979 the company became known as the World Wrestling Federation. The WWF left the NWA in 1983 as they began to expand and the Title was refereed to as the WWF World Heavyweight Championship.

The first WWWF Champion was the original "Nature Boy" Buddy Rogers. Then it moved to the well known Bruno Sammartino who held it for a record that still stands today; 2308 days. It went through such competitors as Ivan Koloff, Pedro Morales and various others before eventually reaching the hands of Hulk Hogan. Hogan helped the World Wrestling Federation to expand through the Nation and took the WWF Title with him. Hogan was seen as "larger than life" and "immortal". He held the Title for a long time and added (despite claims to the contrary) a lot of prestige and credibility to the Title. It was be-noted as the Title to win. If you won the WWF Title, you were a made man in the world of professional wrestling.

It soon switched between various challengers of Hogan ranging from Ultimate Warrior to the Undertaker. Then in 1992, Ric Flair came along and won the Royal Rumble after more than an hour long match. He was sweaty. He was tired. But he was proud. The emotion that Flair had after being handed the WWF Title and the look on his face added instant prestige to the belt. Because when you see this man, with his legacy, winning this Title and getting that emotional over it. Not only do the fans see it as something big and more than a prop. The wrestlers begin to say, "Hey, I want that." Then you have all this competition swirling around the Title and it adds instant credibility and prestige to that Title. As I said, it becomes more than a prop. It becomes more than just a statistic. It becomes an achievement. It becomes real.

Then the Title went to a wrestling purist in Bret Hart. Once again, you had that emotional victory that made the Title mean that much more. It was special commodity. Then a few bad things happened to sort of bring the credibility and prestige of the WWF Championship down a bit. Not to say that Yokozuna was a bad choice as Champion, but the way in which he lost the Title to Hulk Hogan at WrestleMania really brought the Title down and took it to a different direction. You had the future of professional wrestling and a new image in Bret Hart and then they switched it back to Hulk Hogan for a quick fix that wasn't really successful at all.

Eventually though, the Title found its way back to Bret Hart and he carried it for a while for a while and lost it to Backlund who lost it to Diesel and then lost it back to Hart who kept it for around a year. Hart was able to garner so much credibility and prestige to the WWF Championship because he was the best wrestler at that time. So it made since to have him as the WWF Championship. He exuded what the WWF Champion was suppose to portray. Then another great spectacle happened at WrestleMania 12. Bret lost the Title to HBK in an epic Iron man match. HBK was the future and the new image. As Vince would say, "The boyhood dream had come true." The way in which HBK celebrated also added a lot of credibility and prestige to the Title. It's a common trend here with winning the WWF Title. It's all about making it mean something. Making it more than a prop. Making it real.

Then the Title would go on to switch hands between HBK, Sid and Hart on a number of occasions before finding the hands of the Deadman at WrestleMania 13. The Undertaker had finally won the big thing and it was important again because here you had this Deadman who had busted his ass for years and years to finally get that Title back. If he is making it the most important aspect in his wrestling career; then others want to as well. Thus once again, creating more competition. A point I'll touch on after I get through my round about story telling here.

Then another catastrophe occurred. Bret Hart (the then WWF Champion) was screwed out of the Title in Montreal and the Title was basically given to Shawn Michaels. I believe this to be a rather low point of prestige for the WWF Title. It lost a lot that night. It seemed more like a prop again. Once again though, there was a filler for that void of lost prestige and it came in the form of a Texas Rattlesnake named Stone Cold Steve Austin. Austin was becoming very over with the fans and was on the fast track to greatness or as some announcers like to say, "Immortality."

The stage was set for WrestleMania 14 in Boston and Austin's opponent and the WWF Champion, Shawn Michaels. Truth be told, neither man was 100%. Austin had that neck injury from a horribly took piledriver at a previous Summerslam against Owen Hart. HBK had a back problem going into the match to. However, the will that these men fought for the Title even injured was amazing and then Austin captured the Title at the win after Mike Tyson counted the 3. "The Austin Era has begun!" says JR with such enthusiasm. And not only had the Austin Era begun, but a new batch of prestige and credibility was regained to that WWF Title.

Now I'm not going to run down every emotional Title run and every Title switch and every bad Title moment that has occurred in the illustrious history of the World Wrestling Entertainment. But I want a one key point to be noted here. Basically put, even with ups and downs, the WWF Title had prestige and it had credibility. It lost some here and there, but there was always that pivotal time in which it garnered back the lost prestige and credibility. So now we can move on.

The World Wrestling Federation Title soon then (skipping ahead as I said, a few years) was unified with the World Championship (most commonly referred to as the WCW World Heavyweight Championship), on December 9, 2001. Chris Jericho had won the Undisputed Title by defeating both the Rock and Stone Cold Steve Austin on the same night at Vengeance. That was instant credibility to that Undisputed Title. The Title was defended on both Raw and Smackdown of course. Then during the Hogan reign, the company came under some legal issues and the name of the Title was soon changed to the WWE Undisputed Championship (the company obviously was known as WWE instead of WWF now).

The Undertaker soon then had a reign with the Title. It lasted only about a month before he lost it to the Rock in a Triple Threat (also involving Kurt Angle) at the Vengeance PPV. However, in the weeks before that, the Undertaker added instant credibility to that Title. He had a fantastic showing against Jeff Hardy and made it seem like Hardy could actually defeat him. Then the same week, he has a Title match on Smackdown against Kurt Angle in another classic match. Of course then, the Vengeance match with Rock and Angle.

Now this is where it begins to decline from my perspective. The brand split has occurred and Raw and Smackdown were treated as separate entities. Brock Lesner as the then WWE Undisputed Champion was exclusive to Smackdown. So Raw was left without a Champion. So Eric Bischoff (then General Manager of Raw) came out and awarded HHH the World Heavyweight Championship on September 2, 2002. Brock then dropped the Undisputed part and became the WWE Champion. We have one more pit stop on the round about before I make my point. Just bare with me.

John Cena. Unlike many, many people I do not have an issue with John Cena.I think he is overrated but I don't want to go into a tangent, just wanted to state this fact for the record. Now John Cena had introduced a spinner when he won the United States Championship on Smackdown. I was fine with that. It was innovative and it was cool actually. Then when he won the WWE Title and eventually came over to Raw. He had a spinner put on it as well. Again, I didn't exactly have a problem with this. I loved Austin's Smoking Skull belt he used. So I didn't have an issue with this. I understand that as the years have gone by, the WWE Title has evolved and changed to fit with the times. A spinner belt fits with the times. Now that I got the spinner part out of my way, I can come full circle.

However, now as I make my full rotation here. That does not mean the WWE Title has not lost prestige. The main point in which I believe it really lost prestige and began its decline was after the Undertaker lost the Title. Now this has nothing to do with the Rock or Brock Lesner being bad Champions or anything of the sort. It is just a good point in time. The Rock only had it for a short while before losing it to Lesner and Lesner became exclusive to Smackdown. So this leaves us with Two Titles that are apart of the World Wrestling Entertainment. The main reason that this isn't good is because you do not have a clear cut defiant "top dog" in the WWE (especially with the addition of the ECW World Champ). You do not know who it is. You also don't have much of any (actual its basically extinct) competition revolving around the WWE Title or the World Heavyweight Title. The WWE Title (once known as the Title to win) is no longer full of prestige or credibility.

It now has become just a prop you win on television. Now some people may say (ignorantly) that the WWE Title has always been a prop. "This is fake." "It's just a prop." If you have ever cared about the art of professional wrestling, it wouldn't be known as a prop to you. A little side rant there. Anyhow, I feel, along with countless others that I have seen confess it on numerous boards, the Undisputed Title is the way to bring back this prestige and this credibility that the WWE Title once had and should have.

Now how is that you may be asking? Elimination Chamber instantly comes to mind. You do this at Survivor Series. The best place to have an Elimination Chamber and especially one of such importance. You take 3 Raw wrestlers and 3 Smackdown wrestlers (chosen however you want to do that, possibly through qualifying). Not too sure what you do with ECW though. You stick them in this Elimination Chamber. You add that the winner will become the Undisputed Champion of the World Wrestling Entertainment and take the Title to either show he wishes and you have instant credibility and prestige. Because you will have these 6 men (plus those that tried to get into the Chamber) fighting for this Title. They will get bloody. They will sweat. They will get bruised. They will get battered. But in the end, it is all worth it for that Title because it means that much. Of course you should have the announcers playing it up as much as possible and the wrestlers mentioning it in promos and whatnot.

So now you have your Undisputed Champion. Now what? Now you have guys on two rosters fighting for that Title. No matter which way you look at it; you have instant credibility coming to the Title. You will always have fresh opponents. You will always have fresh competition and battles to decide who faces the Undisputed Champion. And you of course, have your "top dog".

Now yes, there are some kinks to work out. As there are with any new idea or change or really anything in wrestling or in life. But those kinks can get worked out because the Title is important. When John Cena and Batista both won their respective Titles at WrestleMania 21, it didn't feel special. It didn't feel must see television. It didn't feel like it meant something. We need more moments like Benoit and Eddie. Not too much or it becomes overplayed, but more emotional and mean something Title wins. That passion needs to come back. The WWE Title needs credibility. It needs it to strive.

Also, at WrestleMania you don't have two Main Events. And in the case of WrestleMania 21 or even WrestleMania 22, you can have one big closing moment instead of two. You also don't have to decide and worry about which Title gets booked above the other (even though we know which one that is). And finally the most important aspect other than it gaining credibility back is that Smackdown can once again regain prestige by having the top dog in the Undisputed Champion coming over to that show and doing whatever they do.

Like I said, there is flaws with the concept of the Undisputed Title coming back. But we can overcome these flaws and work them out because we need the honor of being the WWE Champion to come back. Yes, winning the WWE Title is probably still seen as "making it", but that's because of the Title's history, not current prestige. It needs the prestige of today to make it even more important and to gain back credibility. Winning the WWE Title (or Undisputed Title if it were to happen) needs to be seen as winning the "big one" and something of honor. No longer should it be seen as a "statistic" or the winning of some television prop. Because then, this wacky and crazy entertainment we call professional wrestling becomes reality.

I know that, that piece was really long, but I guess for simplistic reasons. What I am saying is: Do you want the Undisputed Title to come back? This doesn't necessary (as I eluded to) a brand split. Just ONE Title (again not too sure about ECW).

Thoughts?
 

TheAnswer

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
557
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
43
Hmmmmm. It seems like WWE is trying to make 3 separate brands and all making them fighting for there title. I do agree about it losing prestige, but having an Undisputed Champion on three shows can be rough on the champ, and for brands like ECW now with no credible superstars to go after it. I think right now keep three separate champions, and maybe when ECW closes and the roster starts slimming down than do the Undisputed Champion again. But you have to think if it will lose steam or don't work than what do you do?

Plus are you sure you wrote this because you said "whos the #1 Guy? Cena? Booker T? Big Show? All of whom were champions in the fall of last year? So it makes me wonder.
 

JHar888

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
978
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
30
Location
Memphis, TN.
I disagree, but CMS rules, and the Undisputed Title was gay. It was hard work for the champ.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Sure it should come back, 2 champions was annoying let alone 3! I just cant keep up with 3 World Champions its just...it doesnt mean anything anymore. WWE just needs to pull the plug on WWECW and have 1 World Champion.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
32
Location
Racine, WI
The way i see it, having an Undisputed World Champion would be like going back to the glory days of the NWA, where the world champ would defend his belt in all the territories around the country. That's the reason the NWA World Title is such a legendary belt. Having one world champion adds legitimacy to the belt. Why even call it a World championship if there 2 other World titles in the same company? Why even call it a World title if it's only defended on one television show? It actually wouldn't be that bad if each of the three brands had there own titles, but then all three recognized one World Champion.

But, WWE is so concerned with producing "entertainment" as opposed to good quality wrestling, that I really don't think the legitimacy of a world title matters to them. I mean let's face it, wrestling tradition is dead, and the "world" titles in WWE now are just props. I definitely think the WWE should bring back the Undisputed Championship. Who knows, maybe someday it'll happen.

BTW, this is my first post here on impactwrestling.com. I'm looking forward to future debates/discussions with you guys. It's been a while since I've posted on a wrestling forum, and it feels good to be back.
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
having a unified champion would be counterintuative to having three seperate brands. Yes, while it would be like back in the day when the NWA Champ toured different territories, that idea was nixed for a reason, and it wasnt just because Vince bought most of the territories up. The NWA/WCW belt meant so much because of the people who held it. Because of one person, Ric Flair. He put on amazing matches every night. It doesnt matter what territory he was in, he put on amazing matches. Bottom line and thats what matters. A stable champion who delivers consistantly.
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
316
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
Why Do You Care?
good good read and rep + man. anyway, i like the idea. i think we should bring it back. i dont really like the spinner anyway. it was cool when it first came out. but ive always like the undisputed title. good thoughts and good read.
 

samborambo

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
46
I would prefer to have 1 world champ, But how would you have the champion defend it for eg. say Cena was champ and on Raw he was feuding with Orton and on Smackdown he was feuding with batista who would he defend the title against at the next pay per view, Or would we end up with a three way at every main event ( that's without counting ecw)
 

MikeRaw

Guest
Dylan if you wrote this good job...But I think it wasnt you because as they said Cena/Show/Booker were champs last year...But oh well it was a good read and if you wrote it good job...Anyways I dont mind 3 champss cause they are all different shows and all worthy...With only one,a lot less worthy guys wouldnt get reigns....
 

Truth

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
552
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
philly
In the shoutbox you said this post took your 3 days....I would rather you have stolen it then waist away 3 days of your life for a post on a wrestling forum. Therfore I wont respond because thats absolutely pathetic and now I need to throw xbox controllers at cars.
 

Switchy

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
44
Location
Bristol, England
Look at all the desrving ME'ers in WWE who can be feuding for their brands title but if they took away 2 of them that would result in many Me'ers having to drop to the mid card because there would be too many for one title. I disagree that they should bring it back.
 

CenaMark54

Guest
Sometimes I sit back and imagine how good the WWE would be if there was only 1 brand. You would have 1 world title, 1 midcard title and 1 tag title, with the top thirty guys all on one brand. Although some good talent would get lost in the shuffle.

World title picture:
Cena
HHH
HBK
Edge
Orton
Batista
Taker
Khali

IC title picture:
MVP
Flair
CM Punk
Morrison
Kennedy
Umaga
Carlito
Booker
Lashley
Mark Henry

Tag division:
Hardys
London and Kendrick
WGTT
Cade/Murdoch
Duece and Domino

But the WWE is all about making money so this dream will never come true.