• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


#Raw Discussion Thread, Feb 6: Goldberg to answer Brock Lesnar’s WrestleMania challenge

Fauche

Fauche

Well-Known Member
there's no way in hell that this many wwe fans live in portland. this is just seattle in a different building
 
Deezy

Deezy

DZ PZ
Ethan Hunt said:
No, his comment was the match made the most sense from a booking standpoint. Booking that match literally happened tonight. No booking for that match happened before tonight. Whatever.
Click to expand...
No I said Brock interfering and costing himself a guaranteed title match at mania is stupid and doesn't benefit anybody.

I had no opinion on the booking of the match until you brought it up in one of your tangents, then all off a sudden you act like we're trolling you.

Then you start going off on more tangents about mania moments and being a stooge and accepting whatever I'm given.

Even though I never had an opinion either way, just said it's the most likely scenario because Goldberg losing makes no sense and it wouldn't make sense for Brock to cost himself a title shot...That's not revenge, that's idiocy because he just played himself.

Tangent tangent tangent.
 
Sabretooth

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joe attacking Roman is win. Gotta believe this wouldn't be happening if not for Rollins injury but I ain't complaining.
 
Kross Rhodes

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Deezy said:
No I said Brock interfering and costing himself a guaranteed title match at mania is stupid and doesn't benefit anybody.

I had no opinion on the booking of the match until you brought it up in one of your tangents, then all off a sudden you act like we're trolling you.

Then you start going off on more tangents about mania moments and being a stooge and accepting whatever I'm given.

Even though I never had an opinion either way, just said it's the most likely scenario because Goldberg losing makes no sense and it wouldn't make sense for Brock to cost himself a title shot...That's not revenge, that's idiocy because he just played himself.

Tangent tangent tangent.
Click to expand...
:beckylol

Acting like you didn't post this:

:wedone

Which is your troll attempt at shutting down a conversation.

You brought up that people called you a WWE stooge in the past. I can't remember if you said it happened here or at the forum full of neckbeards and I also asked if you were that stooge because you did say you had no opinion. You're allowed to have an opinion. You don't have to defend everything WWE books. If you don't want to see something, you can say this what WWE will probably do, but I'd prefer if they do this.

And you were the one who brought up how the booking of Goldberg to the title made sense leading up to this show.

Whatever if you full good about everything WWE does and calls having an opinion a tangent, I'll leave you to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top