• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
RKO said:
I can almost guarentee you that WWE has a part in TNA already. Ask yourself this question. What happens to all the "free agents" in the WWE? If they are not generating enough popularity, WWE will send them to TNA. Ask yourself this question as well. What free agents havn't went to TNA yet? (Angle, Hardy, Melina, Mickie <3, Gail Kim... they all have) All their contracts expired, so they all went to TNA.

Now ask yourself this question as well; Why would Cena threaten Vince with going to TNA, right before Vince was about to fire Cena, but Triple H came out and relieved Vince.
Is this all making sense now?

As far as, "Will it ever get bigger then the WWE"? No. Not even close... Ever.

The point about wrestlers isn't really valid. I mean Hogan, Savage, Luger , Hall and Nash all moved to WCW before Vince bought them. It's just a wrestler being out of work and going to the next best option. I thought the Cena comment was more about Hogan leaving for WCW also I know he didn't mention names so we'll never know.
 

Arrow1

CURRENTLY 1-0 IN WWE
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
8,691
Reaction score
452
Points
83
Age
29
Location
Star City
Website
www.twitter.com
It's forever doomed, @[Crayo]

@[seabs], Their contract might be outdated to be on TV, but they're still owned by WWE, sort of. It's just my opinion, but I believe Vince trades them, in exchange for money.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
They have actual contracts which do expire though. Their name might be owned by the WWE but the performers themselves aren't owned.
 

CMPuLs3

New Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
433
Reaction score
64
Points
0
Age
31
Sage said:
18-35 is the most popular age-group for WWE fans at the moment.

WWE wouldn't ever sell to Panda Energy, lol.

Well, if you go bankrupt, you kinda have to. Thats how much money and dependance they are putting into WWE Network succeeding.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
CM PuLs3 said:
Well, if you go bankrupt, you kinda have to. Thats how much money and dependance they are putting into WWE Network succeeding.

I'm not sure WWE would put themselves in that position, which is completely unneeded. If it does fail, they'd have a backup plan installed with plenty of money left behind I think. Vince failed with the XFL too remember.
 

CMPuLs3

New Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
433
Reaction score
64
Points
0
Age
31
Crayo said:
I'm not sure WWE would put themselves in that position, which is completely unneeded. If it does fail, they'd have a backup plan installed with plenty of money left behind I think. Vince failed with the XFL too remember.

XFL is nothing compared to what they want to do with this network. Go read up on it.

Side Note: XFL also was during an era where WWE was getting 5.0 ratings weekly and the business was booming.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
I understand the network completely, I'm also convinced it'll be a success. It's a risk, but it's a worth-while risk. They're not stupid enough not to have a backup plan. Why would you put your billion dollar business in a situation like that, when it's completely not needed? They're just doing it to continue promoting the brand, if it fails, they'll be fine.
 

CMPuLs3

New Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
433
Reaction score
64
Points
0
Age
31
Crayo said:
I understand the network completely, I'm also convinced it'll be a success. It's a risk, but it's a worth-while risk. They're not stupid enough not to have a backup plan. Why would you put your billion dollar business in a situation like that, when it's completely not needed? They're just doing it to continue promoting the brand, if it fails, they'll be fine.

This is McMahon's dying project. This is something that he's wanted to try forever so that's why he is putting it in the situation. Personally, I think they are going to lose a shit ton of money off it.

They want to film and edit Legend's House in the same week instead of doing the show months in advance. Awful idea for a reality show.

If you can't get above a 3.0 on your flagship show with your biggest stars, and your second biggest show is under 2.0 regularly...exactly where are you going to find the viewership for a 24 hour network? Especially in the daytime, where kids are in school and people are at work?

If this doesn't work (which it more than likely, won't) Vince will just have to keep throwing money into it and focusing more and more on it instead of the WWE, which allows companies like TNA & RoH to move up in viewers as more people become disenchanted with the WWE.

One thing that I think that the WWE needs to remember is that they are a wrestling company that pays wrestlers to wrestle and people pay to watch wrestling. I'm sorry but there is no way in blue hell I'm going to watch lifestyle shows on the WWE Network.