Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Decent enough cruiserweight. Cons: Not really that good at anything, really. Matt Hardy

  2. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Good role as coward and with a mic in hand can be a great target for babyfaces. Cons: Terrible commentator. Honestly my opinion of him would be a lot higher if wasn;t a commentator (or a woeful one), and just personality. I'd like them to fool around with him as a manager as well...

  3. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Tremendous in the ring when peaked (not just "good", **tremendous**), very charismatic, great mic worker, was on his way to a push, has the look, good heel, good face. Cons: He kind of got worse as a wrestler as he went along. He was never bad or close to it, but he was better in 85...

  4. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Athletic and a little innovative. Not a bad heel either. Cons: Doesn't really know how to string a match together, is a shit face, and has a voice that makes me want to cement my ears shut. Umaga

  5. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Can't say I like his ring work too much, but he doesn't do much I can complain about. He's okay. Also has a cool accent. ;D Cons: Uninteresting and repetitive a lot of the time. Zack Ryder (haha Ryder has no pros)

  6. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: They aren't around anymore. Cons: They were around at one point. Vader.

  7. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Good tag worker, not bad as a singles guy. Cons: Everything else, in all honesty. ZEKE~!

  8. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Personality was very good, over both ways, played a great King role, not a bad worker. Cons: Again, not a "bad" worker, but usually an average one. Never had memorable matches without anyone who wasn't much better than him. Scott Steiner

  9. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Really good in the ring at the right time and not a bad guy for promos. Cons: Can be pretty irritatating at the wrong time and was inconsistent in matches. He also uses the worst move of al time in the bronco buster. Dean Malenko

  10. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Top guy in the ring that seems to be about the closest thing in the past decade to a Ric Flair who can bring everyone to one of their best matches, if not their best. Also is really fun to watch outside of that, is charismatic, not annoying, and can play face and heel well. Cons: He is...

  11. WWE pros/cons

    Pro: good face and heel, and basically as much as you could ask for in the ring for a powerhouse like that. Con: still green and seems only fitted for some kind of bodyguard role. Mick Foley

  12. WWE pros/cons

    Pros: Great worker, was really fun to watch and could do heel & face. Con: A little inconsistent imo. Still love the guy but he didn't have as many great matches as some/most would suggest. Mark Henry
Top Bottom