• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Search results

  1. Sky

    The problem with Commentary in wrestling

    Okay at this point it's clear you're either being a contrarian or you've never watched any wresting at all. We haven't even GOTTEN to address the point when you claim Brock Lesnar was never over. I'm wasting my time here
  2. Sky

    The problem with Commentary in wrestling

    In what? He had two moves, no fundamentals, and got winded during his entrance. His promos were nothing but incomprehensible shouting (and not even fun incomprehensible shouting). He can't be called a good character worker, given his insane ramblings were always just who he really was (see: any...
  3. Sky

    The problem with Commentary in wrestling

    You haven't answered yet: If you don't get over by anything but talent, and Warrior had no talent... why was he over?
  4. Sky

    The problem with Commentary in wrestling

    IDK about this one. The Ultimate Warrior wasn't good at anything but he got belts and the commentators hyped him up. And he certainly got over
  5. Sky

    The problem with Commentary in wrestling

    The problem is every other word being unnecessary branding
Top