Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    It was a no dq match. The match ending with a dq as just been pulled from your ass. Pipedown
  2. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    Yeah but it could take a katsumi or a lissa to determine the rightful result. It's clear as day 1571262787 Nice try. Bet you get your news from the sun newspaper
  3. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    No because a referee stoppage would mean seth wins as he did not break any rules. That is how the world works. Indefensible. They botched the official result of the match.
  4. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    You'd be a fool to argue such a thing. Glad that you are not. My argument is completely justified. You recognise that if you were to complain about it not going in favour of the fiend then you would be in the wrong. It was a no dq match and seth destroyed the fiend to the point where the ref...
  5. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    No the match ended in a ref stoppage. Seth won. He said he won on raw. Seth won the match. We can all decide to be ignorant. Let's all just avoid eye contact with justice when it's staring us directly in our eyes. This isn't a situation where undertaker tapped punk out at breaking point 2009...
  6. Redboy123@

    League Suggestions

    Seth beat the fiend at HIAC. Give me points for it. We all have a moral compass. Let's just do the right thing 1571249867 @Just Kevin you are dumb if you think Seth didn't win at HIAC. Go read a book for once in your life