I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
That's the issue need to stop worrying less about that and more about building the guys up who could be making you money in the future and have their best days ahead of them not behind them. I'm a Taker and HHH fan but they had their time to be the main focus and all that. There isn't ever gonna...
Like I said from a standpoint of giving him a huge match for his career even if he will lose it yeah it makes sense. Only standpoint it doesn't make sense from is if you want Taker to be apart of a great match and possible show stealer. Barrett/Taker def would not be that. Would be a decent...
I didn't have a problem with it because at the time I thought they were gonna go all out on the build up since they had all the ammo to do so. They didn't do until the HBK segment which they should have had him involved more in the story. Was pretty underwhelming on what they could have done...
Good question but logical answer is omg we can't leave Triple H/Taker off the card for different reasons therefore pitting them against each other. Now they could have just did Sheamus/HHH and Barrett/Taker as we have discussed in the past but yeah.
HHH/Taker to me is kinda like how HBK/Austin from mania was years ago. In theory the match wasn't really that great but when taking into consideration the injuries and such it was good. That said I don't like the match as much as I did the night it happened and think Punk/Orton was actually...
Was what I wanted to see last year tbh when they had the segment showing HBK all conflicted. I know the stip was for him to retire but wouldn't have minded them breaking that for that match just made too much sense.
Cody isn't that much more over than Wade but he is more over though. Mic work they're same level to me and in ring work Cody wins that easily. Cody vs Taker would come off too much like it's gonna be a squash. Barrett on the other hand has the advantage of coming off stronger as he was at one...
From a in ring match standpoint I wouldn't wanna see Barrett vs Taker however from a standpoint of building Barrett up and making him a name like they did with Nexus he makes the most sense. I think Taker could have the best match with Orton or Dolph but I do agree with wanting to see Dolph go...
Don't matter who Taker faces at mania the people spending money on aren't gonna be spending it on that match it will be for Cena/Rock do the drawing factor here is irrelevant. Taker could be facing Santino and it wouldn't equal any less buys for the PPV. I do agree that it has to be a big match...
Um Punk didn't get booed against HHH by the way was actually the other way around in one segment so I don't know where you got that from PSYCH. Plus what Sal mentioned as well.
Anyways please don't do this again. You have the big match that will make mania sell no matter what so if there was...
