Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Then Styles has been lying for 15 years because that's the story he's always told. It still proves my point either way. Whether it was WWE or AJ Styles, it wasn't TNA that got in the way.
  2. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    I don't think AJ Styles would even be the AJ Styles we know him as if he signed in 2002. Much different E at the time.
  3. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    AJ Styles actually turned down WWE in 2002 because he didn't want to move.
  4. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    In response to my response, not in his first post. Also did you say Velocity in 2004? Can you not subtract 10 fro 2017?
  5. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    He suggested he should have left TNA 10 years ago. He was in his first year in TNA 10 years ago.
  6. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    As far as I can remember there were several attempts and usually one party wasn't interested. Usually WWE.
  7. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Samoa Joe is Triple H's next Seth Rollins!
  8. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Sure, and they cancel SmackDown the next week... :lmao
  9. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    A Network executive being a bigger mark than fans isn't not working out, it's working out TOO WELL. He was fine on USA and had they not moved him to SmackDown, who knows where he'd be today.
  10. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Everyone get on your knees for your King.
  11. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Trips here to grace us with his holiness.
  12. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Because UPN refused to let him air on their network. He was over, too over.
  13. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    Who suggests that? I don't want that for him because I doubt he could pull it off. It worked great. UPN were just big mark suckers.
  14. Kross Rhodes

    #Raw Discussion Thread, Jan. 30: Stephanie McMahon to address Seth Rollins face-to-face

    2 and a quick Rumble elimination. Like I said no reason to care about round 3.