• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Search results

  1. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    Yes which is pretty much what I said.
  2. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    No, there is lots of things I have rated two and one, maybe less with wrestling than with films for some reason.
  3. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    Yes, but when you see movies rated out of five, then I am pretty sure that a three would be the closest you get to a middle rating, also you rarely get something as bad to be rated zero. Anyhow who knew a Starrcade 92 thread would take on a life of its own:lmao
  4. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    I've seen quite a few times, but would have to watch it again to give you a full reason. I take Chris' point about your rating system being a bit different, but still feel one star is a little low. I would have it at two and an half or three. To me that means a decent match, but one with a...
  5. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    No, not saying that, one star just seems a bit extreme, that should be reserved for something truly dire and I would define anyone to say that match was that bad, but each to their own.
  6. Keith

    WCW Starrcade 1992 “BattleBowl”

    But maybe they book things differently in Japan, also I really don't see the big deal, its not like people are any less likely to cheer for Muta as a result. What is the problem with the finish? Also giving it one star is insulting, it didn't live up to the talent involved, but it was still...
Top Bottom
Menu