Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Keith

    Scotts Classics Discussion and Q and A

    Thing I would say in Van Dam's favour is that when you see some of the crap which has been inducted then you could make a case for him, mostly based on his ECW run as Scott said. Personally I don't think WWE will ever induct him, because I don't think they have ever rated him that highly and...
  2. Keith

    Scotts Classics Discussion and Q and A

    I can answer that, no!
  3. Keith

    Scotts Classics Discussion and Q and A

    Also as a heel it was quite logical for Heenan to say it maybe to wind up the fans, as Hogan prevous was a big babyface. The appeal of the Henning-Hart KOTR 93 match was that it was different from their Summerslam match, that match was based more on great wrestling and emotion, this was more...
  4. Keith

    Scotts Classics Discussion and Q and A

    I actually think Heenan saying what he said was a master stroke, because in a way it throw fans off the scent, as in "no surely not Hogan"? kind of thing.
  5. Keith

    Scotts Classics Discussion and Q and A

    Damn that is a corker of an opener, I have a few ideas, but will let Scott go first.
Top Bottom