Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Why TNA Has Improved

    I might have went overboard with that but Morgan is nothing more than a mid card attraction. He had his main event run in late 2010 when TNA was full of heels with Immortal and Fortune with all that nonsense. It fell flat and nothing happened.

  2. Why TNA Has Improved

    Matt Morgan is garbage and I would never consider him to put him anywhere near the top. Some people say Morgan could be the next big star, then why wasn't he main eventing in TNA? Morgan is up there with Crimson and Bischoff's son as wastes of space.

  3. Why TNA Has Improved

    Great point, it's not like Hogan and Bischoff are geniuses themselves. Everyone is to blame but maybe Dave Lagana is making a bigger impact than people thought.

  4. Why TNA Has Improved

    WWE got rid of Russo in 99 then 2000 ended up being a fantastic year for WWE. TNA gets rid of Russo, now they are starting to do better. I couldn't agree more Keith on how they are pushing less ex talents of major companies but isn't it refreshing not to be waste of space wrestlers like Crimson...

  5. Why TNA Has Improved

    This is from my latest blog but here's the TNA part. The Uncommon One: Comedy In The Bank From the mega company to the company that wrestling fans love to make at the but tend of their jokes. Yet these days, TNA has been anything but a joke. I'll admit that I didn't start watching TNA until...
Top Bottom