Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. WWE Names Its Top 50 Superstars Of All Time

    OK, I get ya, but to counter, similarly Snuka was one of the main faces of the Rock 'n Wrestling/Early WWF-era(*). (*An era which in time, IMO, will prove to have made a longer lasting impression on the mainstream conciousness... Sooner or later the D-Lo Browns & Val Venis's of this world...

  2. WWE Names Its Top 50 Superstars Of All Time

    Guys, my stance here is Pro-Snuka, not Anti-Kane.... On the contrary, having the second before last match at both Sumemrslam 89 & Wrestlemania 6 tell me that when he returned (at which point his career was admittedly on the decline) he was still an upper card guy. As for Kane being one of...

  3. WWE Names Its Top 50 Superstars Of All Time

    My comments aren't based upon who I think is more talented or who I like better. Snuka was one of the quinessential 80's baby-faces; particularly with regard to the WWF. Kane is predominantly an upper midcard jobber.

  4. WWE Names Its Top 50 Superstars Of All Time

    As if whether you like the guy or not has any vbearing on what heights he reached during his career. :roll: Only (thus far) in YOUR opinion. Relavent to the debate how, exactly? (Should I bring up the fact that Scott Hall has been a drunken waste of space for over 10 years of his 18 years...

  5. WWE Names Its Top 50 Superstars Of All Time

    The guy's only at #32 for fucks sake... ....Oh, I forgot, you don't know anything about his career therefor he's a "pointless" figure in wrestling history. Get a grip! :roll:
Top Bottom