Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    I just wanted to throw in a possible (in Cartman voice) na na na na naaa....na na na na naaa, I had a possibly good idea.

  2. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    Chess, Chess, Chess. Did you even read any of my posts? Of course the divas can't draw. That's why they should change then to be similar to the Knockouts and give them their own show (which is what I've been implying all along).

  3. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    Okay, for the fifth time, the whole point of having a whole show would be to help move away from the botchy 8 diva tag matches every week. See above.

  4. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    That's the exact thing I'm saying making an all woman's brand would do. Drive it away from the bull shit we see now. That was my #1 motivation for thinking about all of this. Again, Mark Henry main evented before being moved, Matt Hardy was in the upper-midcard. Besides, they haven't had...

  5. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    Considering all of those guys are almost regulars on the other shows, I'll call wrong on that. Not if they book it right and there is the right talent there? Unless of course you're implying just the simple fact that it's women wrestlers that no one would watch regardless of booking and talent.

  6. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    Did you just read the title of my post? You are essentially agreeing with me. I'm saying to change they way the use the diva's and give them more time. Not give the crap we see more time. If no one wanted to see this, SHIMMER would have failed huge and Awesome Kong, Beth Phoenix, Lita, Mickie...

  7. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    It's too much now because they're not booked seriously. How could they be with just 8 minutes a show. How many matches have had just 2 divas facing off in the past year? I'd say about 10% are one on one matches. The rest are tags, 6 woman tag, 16 woman tags, battle royals.....they make matches...

  8. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    No one wants to see the divas wrestle because they can't get over, chances to improve, etc. but yet you don't mind them taking up time on the shows not doing those things? Odd.

  9. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    This isn't about ECW sucking or not. It's about the fact that they can splice them in with the rest of the roster and use that time for a division that seems out of place on the regular shows. And a for your last comment, Watch Mickie James vs. Trish at WM22 and tell me that all women are good...

  10. WWE should turn ECW into an all women's brand (with a different name of course)

    Obviously WWE wanted to push the women's division a little more since that's where TNA were getting their highest ratings, so why not take it a step further. ECW is basically a watered down RAW or Smackdown! right now. Their ratings are slipping and it's hard to get anyone over if a lot of the...
Top Bottom