Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Difference posting it in public where you were doing the same than personally PM'ing people asking, kind of ruins the point of the thread (for people to vote for who they thought wrote the best piece), but ugh, can't be arsed and I'm just glad this bullshit is over.
  2. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Had quite a read in the PM Admin. Jonathan going around asking people to vote for you isn't cool...
  3. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    No need for your input Zamo. Will cause more problems.
  4. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    It would cause more problems because people would complain in this thread (no wonder we're at 15 pages). It's not "illogical" though since anyone can change their vote.
  5. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Okay one word is banned from this thread, "unfair". Nothing has been unfair. Just putting that out there.
  6. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Adam removing his vote makes things more hostile lmao. 7-6 now, but I agree seabs, the head booker role isn't a necessary for the fed to continue, makes this much less stressful. But anyway, onward we go.
  7. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    +3 rep for that mature post.
  8. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Vote was removed from you and given to him since he changed it. Stop speculating reasons for the change, he said himself he didn't see Zamo's work or something right? Votes are allowed to be changed, he wants Zamo as head booker and not you, so he can change his vote. No rule has said otherwise...
  9. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Well for one we're not a government here, we're a forum where polls can be edited easily. Two, you've not already won, it was 5-5. Just because you won by the deadline, everyone apart from you wanted to extend it as there was plenty more votes. I think it being 7-7 proves that a 5-4 win was...
  10. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    More importantly why would you want to win by a vote that wasn't meant for you? Votes can be changed if they're honest mistakes.
  11. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Done.
  12. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    I can edit the poll to make it 7-7 if you want to change your vote. I forgot I could do this.
  13. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Shut up. Last warning both of you, else I'll just close this and appoint a new head booker myself, and it won't be either of you two.
  14. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Don't turn the thread off-topic. In my opinion no one has won (and in other people's opinion from the look of it) since there's plenty more users who want to vote. Leave it as that. No one here has any bias opinions.
  15. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Thank you. 2 days extension, that fixes everything. 2 votes already after the poll has finished.
  16. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    :sad: Sowwwyyy. Edit: @[Jonathan] that's ridiculous. A users vote isn't deemed on activity at all. Also, it doesn't make you the "rightful winner". Let's say 10 people were rounded in a room, 2 went for president (human X and human Y) of this room, 8 people got to vote who gets it. One person...
  17. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Jonathan, let us extend it for a few days? 5-5 is a bit harsh. Just means that the time span was too short for a user to get his vote in on time.
  18. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    We'll wait and see if @[Jonathan] is noble enough to let it continue for an extra few days.
  19. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    Oh no you had to mention both parties. #IncomingFlameWarNumber2
  20. Crayo

    Head booker role.

    5-5, extend the vote? Still think it should be longer period, some users don't log in every day.
Top Bottom