I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Honestly... Good for you.
Good for you if a movie looking bad doesn't ruin your experience, that's mostly why I go see comic book movies. I'm definitely not expecting amazing stories from them, and that one was no different.
Looks like you didn't pay attention to the CGI doubles or the capes. But it doesn't matter which part of the movie looks worse, again with that budget it should look better overall. Also, that's a movie that has been in the works for nine years.
What the hell are you on about, half the movie is CGI. There is no excuse for half-assing one of the most expensive movies ever made when a movie like Blade II from 2002 looks better.
Not really, I went to see it with a couple of friends, and we all agreed that was terrible. It's also a very ugly movie, CGI look like PS3 graphics.
Also that post credits scene was the final nail in the coffin for the DCEU.
I'm still surprised they didn't cancel this movie after everything that happened with Miller, especially considering that they shelved a couple of those.