Appareently Anarchists

[Kaedon]

are as big of hypocrites as anyone else. My good friend Randy who works at a hospital and I had a great discussion last night. He told me that the "mainstream notion and definition of Anarchy is wrong" because Anarchists dont really want NO rules or organization, they just want as little as possible. This was all spurned from him telling me that he will be writing for an Anarchist magazine. I really hate when people think like that. Republicans dont want free market capitalism, they want it until the banks fail due to a lack of regulation. Liberals want civil liberties until a plane crashes into a building or two and then they are willing to sign away their rights for the illusion of safety.

Now, I dont really have a problem with being measured in response, but if you are going to pervert the meaning of something to suit your selfish needs, well fuck you.

 

[straight_edge76]

Anarchy is realistically impossible. Think about it how would America react if there was no form of authority? Look at whay happened to Iraq after Sadaam was "obliterated" aha. It was pandamonium. Anarchists all wish that there was no Governtment but I think that some of them just want to run things themselves.

 

[MikeRaw]

I'd say I'm left wing, but Anarchy is too far fetched and has too many flaws for me to consider wanting.

 

[★Chuck Zombie★]

Yeah, everybody's just about like that. Everyone always want to change policy to prevent stuff from happenening, even if it contradicts previous policies. Why can't they realize that trying harder to enforce your ideas and policies doesn't make you look like a hypocrite.

Anarchy wouldn't be chaos like a lot of people believe. It would be hell. There will always be someone who wants to control others and with no rules, warlards and gangs would control everything.

 

[straight_edge76]

Anarchy is all but impossible.

End of discussion.

 

[Kaedon]

Not if you change the definition, which is what people are now doing.