No Way Out *Spoilers*,

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Evil Austin

Guest
-- Source Wrestlezone

NWO Main Event

PWInsider.com is reporting that at WWE's No Way Out PPV in February, which features the return of the Elimination Chamber Match, will see both the WWE Title and the World Heavyweight Title defended at the same time in the chamber match.

========================

So what do you guys think of this? the fact that the Chambers in NWo won't be for number 1 contender purposes but for the actual title. And that might mean Christian in there cause the title might be Vacated on Smackdown or something. Like Christian vs. Jeff vs. Edge vs. Show vs. Taker vs. Matt ??

I just want to spend five seconds laughing at R - Truth's entrance saying What's up to 29 other guys in the ring. :no_1:

and I know I stuffed up the title, I was about to put the RR card in the title hence the "," but I forgot and clicked post before. :(
 

JurassicBonez

Active Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
Easton, Maryland
Wasn't it already confirmed that on the Smackdown side, it would be Taker, Kozlof, Triple H, Edge, Big Show, and Jeff in the Chamber in the WWE mag.?

But I'd rather them have only one chamber match to whichever brand doesn't win the Rumble, rather than have two of them.

will see both the WWE Title and the World Heavyweight Title defended at the same time

But then this got me thinking. By the way this is worded, it's like they actually mean that whoever wins the match will be undisputed champ, as it says both will be defended at the same time. So is that at the same time in the match, or at the same ppv?
 

Evil Austin

Guest
Wasn't it already confirmed that on the Smackdown side, it would be Taker, Kozlof, Triple H, Edge, Big Show, and Jeff in the Chamber in the WWE mag.?

Aren't WWE mags just for kid's to read? :crazy: I haven't read one fully since 2004. Seriously. And it had taker on the cover.

-- Edit and yeh your above is quite interesting I hadn't noticed it until now. Though I think it was just strangely worded, I doubt it will be a undisputed Title match.
 

CenaMark54

Guest
Honestly, I wish they would just ditch NWO. They should just use the time between RR and WM to build the WM feuds. Not throw together some random elimination chamber matches.
 

JurassicBonez

Active Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
Easton, Maryland
I don't read the magazine, it was posted as a spoiler maybe last week or two weeks ago. And I read the article on wrestling sites about it. But yeah, the way it's worded that's how it seems the match will be. But I doubt they could build-up a match like that in 4 weeks til NWO.
 

Evil Austin

Guest
yeh for something like that to be builded up it needs a good few months cause you would need Champion vs. Champion interpromotional promo's and interfeerance angles to make them both put it up on the line against each other in one chamber.
 

GaRdEnGnOmE23

New Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
35
Location
Norwich, England
I don't see the point of having both titles on the line at NWO, wouldn't it make the rumble seem pretty pointless seeing as 6 guys will get a chance at the title at NWO. So where does that leave the winner of the rumble?
 

MikeRaw

Guest
The only way thea twould work, is if they were bringing back the Undisputed Belt. Because whoever wins will have both titles, so my guess is they would unify them after.
 

C4

Guest
Taker, Kozlof, Triple H, Edge, Big Sho

:eek:

And by the way, the Elimination Chamber Matches are going to be awesome. But having both the Championships being defended in one match won't be a wise decision, they should instead have two separate matches.
 

Wordlife

Guest
yeah I think 2 seperate matches would be better... too much cluster, it will confuse people too
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
41
Location
Knoxville, TN
I thought this involved the return of the "New World Order" with all this recent Hogan return talk (see spoilers section)!

No Way Out is different than most PPV's and I kinda like that part of it, though I'm not so sure about having both titles defended. I'm going to wait till we get closer to make any opinions about it.
 

Wordlife

Guest
lol yeah when I first saw this thread.. I though the same damn thing:

NWO IS COMING BACK?

Then I read Elimination Chamber, so I was like awwww damn! lol

Hulk Hogan is too old though, whats the point
 

Wordlife

Guest
I know... Ninja should've put No Way Out Spoilers instead (yay me!!! 2000th Post!!! lol)
 

Evil Austin

Guest
Yay, but I originaly put it as NWO instead of NO Way Out cause I was going ot save room and put in the Rumble card too but I forgot hence why I put in the botched ","