What in the blue hell did Raw just do?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


JurassicBonez

Active Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
Easton, Maryland
Kane vs Orton in a program on the Road to Mania is a bad idea all together. Which is why it would have been better for a mid-carder whose doing absolutely nothing but floating around, and that would be Kingston, as they have history in ECW too. But Orton was a bad idea at the moment, he's trying to get the world title, trying to get The Legacy together, and now the whole Kelly Kelly thing, which would add Kane into the mix on the Road to Mania. Bad booking there if you ask me. It's the beginning of shoving Orton in our faces, guaranteed.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
Besides, to all of those people thinking that this would end in Kane getting push, get your head out of your asses. Putting Kane in a feud with Orton would result in nothing more than pure burial. WWE is building Orton as their man, hell, I am seeing him more on my TV than the so called "man" John Cena, so Kane has no chance in hell in even getting booked strong in the feud.
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
It makes sense, but it's inredibly pointless. Kane needs to retire soon just so that WWE can give him a good final storyline.
 

JurassicBonez

Active Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
3,575
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
Easton, Maryland
I think that the idea of Kane feuding with Orton (when 1st hearing about it) sounds like a good idea and good feud, but when you think about it, it has job job job written all over it. This is the same Big Red Machine that teamed with The Worlds Strongest Man and was constantly jobbed out to Mysterio and Bourne. And not just on RAW but on ECW too. If him and Orton were to feud, it would probably be used just as a filler for Orton to keep him occupied and away from the title (if he doesn't win it). Hell, even if he does win it, Kane could be used as just a filler.

WWE is building Orton as their man, hell, I am seeing him more on my TV than the so called "man" John Cena

You don't think that's bad? Remember Cena when he was heel on smackdown, bad ass heel, slowly started getting cheered, turned face, won WWE title, came to RAW, and was shoved in out faces for years. (no I'm not a Cena hater). Same thing could very well happen to Orton, I already see that starting to happen now with Orton now being involved in 3 angles. Miz and Morrison are on tv a lot but it's 3 different shows that's they're on, and it's not all promos, or all wrestling, it's well balanced. If they can balance Orton in 3 angles all on one show, WWE gets major props.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
I am not saying it's a bad thing. I love it.

I am just comparing the role WWE is giving to Randy Orton and how that makes it obvious Kane would get squashed if they were to feud.
 

Mr.Enigma

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
48
Location
Jacksonville Florida
They could be setting up for a Orton take out Kane angle to add to his list of those he has taken out. This would either take Kane out by way of retirement, putting him on the side for some lengthy time period with a valid "excuse" or as it has been said, allow Orton to get pushed, thus using Kane as the vehicle to do it.

Personally, I think Kane needs to spend the rest of his days in TNA. I think he would be used so much better right now that is and like Christian and others that went to TNA, he just simply needs something fresh and I think TNA could be that answer considering how WWE is doing with him now.