The 50th No Smark Zone!!!!

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


kingovkings

Active Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
50
Location
ENGLAND UK
Yup that would be good to see again but we probs wont see in the near future :(. Even though i miss them things i realise that things change with the times and although i miss that stuff. It still hasn't spoilt the programme for me.
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
yeah, there is a difference between Batman, an iconic figure who draws on name recognition ALONE and Spongebob. I shouldnt have brought Bats into this discussion because its a bad example. And you hit the nail on the head, it makes it "realistic" when you aim for kids, you make it a little more preposterous.
 

Evil Austin

Guest
Kaedon I just saw this and it was a great read and I agree TNA is watchable right now it has the Main Event Mafia going and as much as it isn't done properly it is still dragging you in to see what happens and it is a better improvement. I agree with about everything else you said in the wwe too.
And great job going back in a history lesson of wrestling lol.

edit:
Also on a side note, about a week ago you promised me a spot in the 50th editoin... whaa :ranting:
 

the dark knight

Guest
yeah, there is a difference between Batman, an iconic figure who draws on name recognition ALONE and Spongebob. I shouldnt have brought Bats into this discussion because its a bad example. And you hit the nail on the head, it makes it "realistic" when you aim for kids, you make it a little more preposterous.
..........no.

bottom line is, you can have a show without saying ONE bad word, not showing any blood and still make it entertaining enough for adults. wwe aren't doing that.
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
Yes, the wwe arent doing that because they arent GEARING IT TOWARDS ADULTS!!
 

Evil Austin

Guest
I agree Kaedon but what TDK is trying to say is the WWE can still aim it at Kids but still without using cursing, blood or racial remarks like in the attiude era and with Undertaker sacrificing people. TDK is saying it can still be a bit better without all of those stuff and still make it watchable for people under 12.
 

the dark knight

Guest
why the fuck wouldn't they if its for their own good?
 

Jabroni900

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
Location
Smackdown Hotel
They could at least have PPVs rated 14 - I mean who the hell are all these kids that have suddenly started buying PPVs with their hard earned cash since there PG?

If you can seriously say that this product is a step forward and not a great leap backwards for the WWE you're simply ignorant...or Blue.