What should I think?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


dstebbins

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
465
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
35
Sting says he's been doing his actions since Victory Road because the young guys in the locker room are spoiled brats who have no respect for the veterans and think they have already paid all their dues. He is determined to bring respect back into the wrestling business.

This sounds like a shoot problem backstage that they're working into a wrestling angle, like Sting, Nash, and others truly feel this way. Should I agree with Sting, since he has a valid point, or should I disagree with him, since he's playing the role of the heel? It's confusing.
 

chessarmy

Guest
I don't think he is playing the role of a heel, and the young guns aren't playing the role of heels either. Both "teams" seem to be tweeners in this situation, its really up to you to choose who to cheer for. I'm obviously on the younger guys' sides, sure the veterans helped pave the way for today's stars, but its the younger guys that are going to keep Pro Wrestling alive and drive it to the success that it once had.

This seems like a brilliant storyline idea, I just hope that a good Bound For Glory main event comes out of it
 

dstebbins

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
465
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
35
I don't think he is playing the role of a heel, and the young guns aren't playing the role of heels either. Both "teams" seem to be tweeners in this situation, its really up to you to choose who to cheer for. I'm obviously on the younger guys' sides, sure the veterans helped pave the way for today's stars, but its the younger guys that are going to keep Pro Wrestling alive and drive it to the success that it once had.
No one's the heels, eh? Sting only attacks faces, and he always drops the bat down to heels like Booker T and Kurt Angle. How is that not heelish?

This seems like a brilliant storyline idea, I just hope that a good Bound For Glory main event comes out of it[/QUOTE]

I can think of two:

Sting vs. Samoa Joe for the World Title, and
Jeff Jarrett & AJ Styles vs. Kurt Angle & Booker T (Jeff returns at No Surrender).
 

humankiller99

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
483
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
47
Location
HELL aka Brooklyn NY
i think this smells of the millionaires club vs the new blood that happened back in wcw. i think Jarrett will side with AJ, Christian and Joe to fight Angle, Sting, Nash and booker t.

and I agree with the last poster about the possible matches at BFG
 

chessarmy

Guest
No one's the heels, eh? Sting only attacks faces, and he always drops the bat down to heels like Booker T and Kurt Angle. How is that not heelish?

After what happened on iMPACT! I think as a fan, you could say that he had a valid reason for attacking the babyfaces. Thats why I would classify him as a tweener, because he did heelish things but at the same time, he had good reasoning behind it