You would let me off with a warning
Yeah I would, lol. If I still worked the road. I sit in an office in Atlanta now, until I have to go investigate a serious wreck.
You would let me off with a warning
Also, I've said it once and I'll say it again, no damn government should tell anyone (of legal age) who they can and can't arrange. Hell, if folks want multiple spouses, let them have at it.
If he’s heavily religious that’s probably a 7030 that he believes being gay is a choice and if he’s part of the 30% doesn’t think the thoughts are a choice they still think the acting on it is a choice.Does Dak thinking being gay is a choice? Someone should ask him that, without quoting me.
I had no idea what part of the 14th Amendment you were even trying to interpret to justify it because people are trying their best to twist it to justify what they want it to mean. I never claimed to be a legal or constitutional scholar but many people who are disagree with you. I think your interpretation that 'equal protection of the law' justifies legalizing gay marriage is a stretch at best. That can be bent and skewed many different ways to mean many different things. I think equality is that everyone has a right to marriage. Which everyone had before this ruling. The Constitution does not define marriage. It is too vague to justify it. Since it does not define it, that is left up to the States to do....as the Constitution says. That is why we need a Constitutional Amendment or a Federal Law to codify it. Just like abortion. I just wish people didn't try to bend and shape the Constitution to mean what they want it to mean. The same people who does this will argue that the 2nd Amendment (Which is MUCH more clear than this argument) doesn't count. You cannot have it both ways. If it isn't specifically laid out in the Constitution, it is the Legislative Branch's responsibility if they want to change something. Stop trying to take short cuts. Stop trying to bend the Constitution into a pretzel until it somehow justifies what you want it to mean. It doesn't work that way.There is no interruption to equal. You either mean equal or you don’t.
I don't hate them. Never said I did. I don't want to open that whole can of worms but you know the real argument here and I am not going to get into it."God doesn't hate Gay People, but a very specific passage of the bible makes it seem God will punish gay people, so I should hate them regardless!"
At this point, I think his crush from school or work - ended up being a lesbian. And he has been titled ever since.
It’s honestly pretty simple. Let’s break it down.I had no idea what part of the 14th Amendment you were even trying to interpret to justify it because people are trying their best to twist it to justify what they want it to mean. I never claimed to be a legal or constitutional scholar but many people who are disagree with you. I think your interpretation that 'equal protection of the law' justifies legalizing gay marriage is a stretch at best. That can be bent and skewed many different ways to mean many different things. I think equality is that everyone has a right to marriage. Which everyone had before this ruling. The Constitution does not define marriage. It is too vague to justify it. Since it does not define it, that is left up to the States to do....as the Constitution says. That is why we need a Constitutional Amendment or a Federal Law to codify it. Just like abortion. I just wish people didn't try to bend and shape the Constitution to mean what they want it to mean. The same people who does this will argue that the 2nd Amendment (Which is MUCH more clear than this argument) doesn't count. You cannot have it both ways. If it isn't specifically laid out in the Constitution, it is the Legislative Branch's responsibility if they want to change something. Stop trying to take short cuts. Stop trying to bend the Constitution into a pretzel until it somehow justifies what you want it to mean. It doesn't work that way.
My high school girlfriend ended up being a lesbian years after we broke up. Our first three sum together was years after we split with my other ex.
She didn't appreciate your skelator memesMy high school girlfriend ended up being a lesbian years after we broke up. Our first three sum together was years after we split with my other ex.
I didn't want to get into this but, fuck it.Are you trying to deny that gay people exist? Because if they exist you can’t say that they can’t get married while straight people can get married because that would be a violation of both the civil rights act and the 14th amendment.