• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Rawkus Keyes

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Location
Michigan
90 precent of the time when undertaker is handed a mic he never says anything. He only talks on the titantron or over PA to try to scare people.
Taker however is better then Cena. Cena teaming with Taker would be worth the price of admisson... well as long as they are fighting a decent team. Anyone at or lower then Deuce N' Domino's level would make a squash match.
 

Markz

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
503
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Undertaker may have less moves compared to when he first started, but Taker is too OLD. Soon Taker will retire. Plus Cena is a Twat! :)
 

MC Rae

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
United kingdom
Taker owns Cena.

Call me stupid but I think The Undertaker is still having great matches. Something that makes Taker's gimmick great is the lack of words, Taker can carry a match and STILL gets an incredible crowd reception after all these years.
 

John Doe

New Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
34
Okay....I said it once, I'll say it 344,302 times. Cena does not decide how long his title rign lasts.

This is where your wrong. People don't actually HATE Cena as most people are smart enough to figure out it is fake. People hate Cena's in ring persona and his wrestling skills. Sure his reign lasting so long is not his fault. However it gets annoying for some people seeing his persona constantly be at the top when his wrestling skills are worse than many underachieving wrestlers.

I personally do not mind John Cena's character or wrestling skills but I can see why people would get annoyed with it.

As for Undertaker he is pretty rusty these days but the guy has been wrestling for like 18 years give him a break! In his prime he was untouchable.
 

King Of Kings

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
598
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
Location
PA
I dont think either of them suck but i was annoyed that cena had the title for so long.
 
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
616
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
43
Undertaker Owns Cena....and always will....if 'Taker got the mic more often and he would eat Cena for breakfast...lunch...and dinner without breaking a sweat....
 

HBKristen

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
39
Location
Florida
i'll go ahead and say that i prefer cena to the undertaker simply because i prefer randy orton to batista. cena's a little more personable (obviously). i don't like either of them - they both suck. i mean, the undertaker died, for godsake. get rid of that guy.
 

Rell

Active Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
34
i'll go ahead and say that i prefer cena to the undertaker simply because i prefer randy orton to batista. cena's a little more personable (obviously). i don't like either of them - they both suck. i mean, the undertaker died, for godsake. get rid of that guy.


Finally, I thought It was just me. Undertaker is a huge piece of Wrestlecrap that for some odd reason became popular. He's always been average in the ring (Yeah I said it) and besides his 30 min. entrance (Which I hate) there isnt much more to the guy. Retire already!
 

Soulpower

Guest
Undertaker is a huge piece of Wrestlecrap that for some odd reason became popular.

And that's part of the reason why he's such a success. He made a lame-ass gimmick work for a long. I will say he's average in the ring, hell, all of Taker's matches that are considered good to great were against:

Hart, Foley, Michaels, Angle, Lesnar... It was a bit difficult not to have a good match against those guys.
 

basherbelding

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
43
i like cena,

remember the 'E' in WWE stands for entertainment i think the John cena is very entertaining so is the undertaker i thoght John cena made a very good champ and to be honsest john cena is a good wrestler and the amount of moves does not mater so the person who wrote this thread i respect :)
 

CenaMark54

Guest
Undertaker is a huge piece of Wrestlecrap that for some odd reason became popular.

And that's part of the reason why he's such a success. He made a lame-ass gimmick work for a long. I will say he's average in the ring, hell, all of Taker's matches that are considered good to great were against:

Hart, Foley, Michaels, Angle, Lesnar... It was a bit difficult not to have a good match against those guys
.

You can add HHH and Batista to that list. He also had a pretty damn good match with Orton once.