Reasons for why Vince Death angle was more Hoax than H.H1990 sting Hoax

  • Thread starter Beer Money Army
  • Start date
  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Beer Money Army

Guest
They only ran the angle for 2 weeks. How in the hell are they supposed to get a ratings spike after two weeks. They had just started the angle and then it was abruptly dropped. You can't say it was unsuccessful when it never really got under way.



This isn't the first time they've televised stuff that if it were real, no one else would show. How many times have people been set on fire, thrown off high things, cars wrecked while people were "in them." So what, it's not like they were saying it was real to the media. They know we know it's a storyline. Anyone who believed otherwise thinks everything else is real too.



So, you're saying it's unrealistic to do on tv because that's not how they do it on other tv shows? I'm quite sure detectives and investigators don't always walk around in pairs.

1. Well they were getting all this news media attention for it over there in the states so they proabably thought this is going be huge.....

2. yeah i know that... But killing a person.. I thought in WWEparent.com policy says that can't put any angle or storyline of someone dying.. Isn't why they have to say paul bear at GAB 2004 didn't died but got badly injured????

3. Yeah It just didn't look right and portrayed right usually they take alot of them to the police station for questioning rather than askign them there as they recorded alot of the interviews or writie down the minutes of the talk to the person or persons.....
 

★Chuck Zombie★

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
1. Well they were getting all this news media attention for it over there in the states so they proabably thought this is going be huge.....

Yeah, they started to, but it wasn't enough in enough time to do anything.

2. yeah i know that... But killing a person.. I thought in WWEparent.com policy says that can't put any angle or storyline of someone dying.. Isn't why they have to say paul bear at GAB 2004 didn't died but got badly injured????

No, their "parent pages" say nothing of the like. They probably changed that Paul Bearer (and Muhammed Hassan too) was just injured because it wouldn't be worth a huge "death faking" storyline if they were to return.

3. Yeah It just didn't look right and portrayed right usually they take alot of them to the police station for questioning rather than askign them there as they recorded alot of the interviews or writie down the minutes of the talk to the person or persons.....

I understand where you are coming from, but I wouldn't expect them to be realistic to every detail ever, let alone on something so moot.