The Young Bucks debate

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Pop Tatari

Christian vieri
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
4,092
Reaction score
2,137
Points
113
Location
London, United Kingdom
Was not sure where to put this due to their Japan commitments but anyway I saw a similar thread elsewhere and I know a few on here tsar and leo c who dislike them. I do not mind them despite every single match being structured the same and they are quite funny but I do not get why they are so big like they are despite their laziness in ring. All they do is their sig spots an superkicks, they do not do any individual moves whatsoever. As i said I do not mind them at times but to warrant the New japan hard on and booking they get in general is bizzare
 

britishheel

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
178
Points
3
Age
34
Location
Dark Side of your Moonie
Favorite Wrestler
beermoney
Favorite Wrestler
chrissabin
The fans love stuff that entertains so that means they'll always get booked to do those things and win.
 

Roadster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
44,470
Reaction score
4,214
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
uUsHwHt
Favorite Wrestler
CVWSrPC
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
L1l4tIp
When I think of the phrase "Spot monkey" - they come to mind. They can have a good back and forth match, without any superkicks and their match at Global Wars proved that. They are funny and are good in a number of aspects, but they're just so repetitive. They hardly ever do anything but super kicks and their horrendously named spots. Indy Taker? Meltzer Driver? Got to be kidding me.

Another thing that annoys me about them is their fans. The same people that rag on Cena for doing 5 moves, cheer for guys that do 1. I'm pretty sure I've said that their gimmick is the guys that do Superkicks.

Not saying they aren't entertaining because they can be. But they're lazy, repetitive, and the few actual moves they do are over-complicated spots that are accurately named like shit.
 

Rogue

Active Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
31,583
Reaction score
5,877
Points
28
Age
30
Location
The United States of Ambrose
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
kassiusohno
Way too into their gimmick for me. That isn't always a bad thing, but it is in their case. 5 suck its *superkicks* you're dead *the tag team rolling backbreaker you've seen them do every match* too sweet me. Etc etc. Just meh.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
They take themselves way too seriously. They know that their schtick works, and refuse to deviate or adapt it one bit. And when criticized they go on the automatic defensive, often by bringing up how much money they make off of t-shirts.

A prime example is the recent Bullet Club angle that took place at Global Wars. They are set up as the biggest of heel groups in the company, and they immediately start pandering to the crowd. They refuse to be the heels they are presented as, which ruins the narrative presented.


That these two have built a mini empire off of their own sweat and tears is commendable. But I tired of them rather quickly. The charm wears off rather fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rain

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Yeah, as much as I don't like them I don't blame them for doing the same shit as for some reason everyone loves it. I'm really not sure why, I get why some people would like them but them being the most over act on the indies for so long is odd for me.