The Reason Muhammad Ali Is Better Than Floyd Mayweather

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
36
Because he couldn't beat Muhammad Ali in a boxing match, especially a prime Ali. It's that simple, really.

In my opinion, to be the 'best' of anything that concerns fighting, you have to be able to defeat EVERYBODY, no matter what their size, strength, or weight is. Imagine someone walking around on the street saying they were the greatest fighter in the world or the baddest person in the world. You would naturally interpret them as meaning that they could beat anyone and everyone that they crossed paths with. But if they were to say I'm the greatest fighter/baddest person in the world even though I refuse to fight anyone that isn't my own size and weight, you would
laugh1.gif
. Because that's not truly being the best fighter in the world overall then, is it?

Ali was a HEAVYWEIGHT. So we know he can stand toe to toe with smaller boxers as well as the big ones. Can Floyd, at his size, defeat Muhammad Ali, whether it be the 60's Ali or the 70's Ali? If not, then how can be 'better?'
 

Billc

Jobber
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Messages
81
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
United States
If I am right and I never watched the great Ai. He lost 2 or 3 times and came back to win. So far, Mayweather hasn't lost. IDK who would've been "better". So Ali was 0 for losses too I guess you could say.