Official RAW ratings - 16th April

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
The 4/16 edition of Raw did a 3.1 rating, with 4,336,000 viewers. The show did hours of 3.05 and 3.11 while the viewership rose by 34,000 people from hour one to hour two.

Source: PWinsider

Since Big Hoss isn't here until Friday, I guess it's my job.

Expected a rating like that, with no Brock (actually there) and a taped show it's not that bad.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
It's fair for this week, but 3.1 has been the rating for the third week in a row, I think. The problem used to be with losing viewers in the second hour, what's not happening now, but the ratings have been kinda low this week.
 

Saylor

Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
193
Points
63
Age
29
Website
www.wweforums.net
Leo C said:
It's fair for this week, but 3.1 has been the rating for the third week in a row, I think. The problem used to be with losing viewers in the second hour, what's not happening now, but the ratings have been kinda low this week.

The rating's being low is understandable this week as it was a taped show, so some people looked at the spoilers instead of watching the show.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Saylor said:
The rating's being low is understandable this week as it was a taped show, so some people looked at the spoilers instead of watching the show.

Yeah, shows with spoilers always lose viewers. But the point I was making is that it's not the first week the show makes a 3.1, which is a bit below average if I recall correctly. Just pointing out.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Yeah it is, but they rarely get above a 3.3 now, very rarely. It was only a couple years ago they were getting regular 4's.

I can't wait for them to be 2's and 1's so we finally get a revamp of the product.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
They had a 2.9 just this year, and it was a show just after a PPV. WWE - like all the critics say - is dying, well the show is. Behind the scenes they're making more money than ever, but they have a much bigger opportunity than previous years due to the rise of social networking.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
Like I say the name WWE will probably keep them up there, dropping into a 1 is very unlikely imo as they have the core fan base who tune in no matter how bad the show is.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Crayo said:
Yeah it is, but they rarely get above a 3.3 now, very rarely. It was only a couple years ago they were getting regular 4's.

I can't wait for them to be 2's and 1's so we finally get a revamp of the product.

I'd mark so hard for a 2.5