The thing is, there are 3 universe of equal sizes.
1- Our universe
2- Hell
3- Heaven
All are as ball shapes. with several layers of atmospheres. and each atmosphere is build with stones. here is the answer to your question man.
That's fine and dandy for you as that's what you believe in. Personally, I don't believe in heaven and hell.
Yeah, Kannibal what you're basically talking about is Quantum Physics. I've been reading on that stuff for a bit now. This is along the lines of what you're talking about.
The
Everett many-worlds interpretation, formulated in 1956, holds that all the possibilities described by quantum theory simultaneously occur in a "
multiverse" composed of mostly independent parallel universes. This is not accomplished by introducing some new axiom to quantum mechanics, but on the contrary by
removing the axiom of the collapse of the wave packet: All the possible consistent states of the measured system and the measuring apparatus (including the observer) are present in a
real physical (not just formally mathematical, as in other interpretations)
quantum superposition. (Such a superposition of consistent state combinations of different systems is called an
entangled state.) While the multiverse is deterministic, we perceive non-deterministic behavior governed by probabilities, because we can observe only the universe, i.e. the consistent state contribution to the mentioned superposition, we inhabit. Everett's interpretation is perfectly consistent with
John Bell's experiments and makes them intuitively understandable. However, according to the theory of
quantum decoherence, the parallel universes will never be accessible for us, making them physically meaningless. This inaccessiblity can be understood as follows: once a measurement is done, the measured system becomes
entangled with both the physicist who measured it and a huge number of other particles, some of which are
photons flying away towards the other end of the universe; in order to prove that the wave function did not collapse one would have to bring all these particles back and measure them again, together with the system that was measured originally. This is completely impractical, but even if one can theoretically do this, it would destroy any evidence that the original measurement took place (including the physicist's memory).
inch: