Brock Lesnar: WWE Champion

[Postman Dave]

- Jim Ross wrote on Twitter that Daniel Bryan vs Brock Lesnar at Summerslam is a "no brainer" and Brock Lesnar should win the belt at the event. He also said it was time to "cue the part-time debate," as some believe Lesnar shouldn't have the belt due to his limited schedule.

As you wish JR!

So with the streak conquered, it seems obvious that Brock Lesnar should be competing for the WWE title at some point soon. He's got the biggest badass aura right now and it would be wasted on meaningless "dream matches" that achieve nothing in the long run.

But of course, there's the issue of his schedule. If Brock was to win the title at, say Summerslam, it'd be a waste to immediately drop it again a month after. And Brock's schedule indicates he wouldn't be back until the new year. Can the WWE get away without having it's number one title around?

 

[Fuji Vice]

But of course, there's the issue of his schedule. If Brock was to win the title at, say Summerslam, it'd be a waste to immediately drop it again a month after. And Brock's schedule indicates he wouldn't be back until the new year. Can the WWE get away without having it's number one title around?

I think they can get away with it just fine. Initially there's the past history where Hogan as champ was barely seen, although he did defend at house shows which is something Brock wouldn't do.

Then you also have the idea of splitting the titles again, where Brock leaves with them both, HHH decides to put one in good old abeyance and hold a tournament of some sort. Booking 101 would then indicate that Bryan could win that tournament (thus pissing HHH off even more) and going on to 'Mania to unify the titles once again by defeating Lesnar in a rematch. Of course he'd also have to win the Rumble to accomplish this so sorry Roman Reigns fans, suck it.

Obviously that booking is very unlikely to happen (would still be fucking cool though) but again, I think they can get away with Lesnar holding the belt(s) from Summerslam until 'Mania. Besides, even if he's not there, Heyman will more than make up for his absence and can crow on and on about how his client is not only the streak-breaker but also the undisputed champion. GOLD!

 

[O-Blaze]

I mean, it makes sense that he would become WWE Champion,but should they really do that? Brock broke the streak, I feel that's enough. Plus he is now the baddest man in WWE, so for Brock to get the belt, you would need someone believeable to beat him, I don't know if Daniel would be believeable, so it would need to be someone else. But I guess him beating Triple B, Batista, and Orton in one night really could help make it believable. Screw it, go ahead and do it.

Sent from my N860 using Tapatalk 2