WWE and its PG rating

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Undertaker

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
150
Reaction score
4
Points
18
World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) is the top wrestling promotion in the world. It is a multi-million pound company but since 2008 the product has changed whether it changed for the better or worse I will leave down to the reader. June 22nd 2008 to be exact, the date that the WWE went PG. The idea behind it getting children to tune in whilst their young and they would stay with the company throughout their teens and into adulthood. But, has the change from an edgier product to a child-based program lost the WWE more fans than they have gained?

Lets go back to the Attitude Era when Austin 3:16 first emerged and things were just heating up with World Championship Wrestling (WCW) and the nWo and DX factions were created. It was a fantastic time, wrestling was 'cool' again and it had moved away from the misconceptions that many people held. At the height of the Attitude Era ratings were up at 6 and 7 for shows. Fans were able to relate to gimmicks such as Steve Austin's. There was excellent character and storyline building, matches, promos and backstage segments were more edgier, wrestlers bladed, more risks were taken and controversial storylines were created. All of this captivated the audience in the arena as well as the millions of people watching around the world. WWE was producing less shows but with better content. It is interesting to note that WWE appeared to become complacent for the forthcoming years with no real competition the product remained steady and ratings further decreased however, they still had most of their top wrestlers and there was a feeling that 'nothing was off limits' during WWE programming - there was still that surprise factor.

Fast forward to June 22nd 2008 when the company went PG. A lot of people did not realise it because the feud between Shawn Michaels and Chris Jericho was nearing its end and we had seen plenty of non-PG acts during their feud. However, as the months went on and we were faced with more John Cena it became clear that the WWE had decided to go in a new direction. Now it's fair to say that for those fans who had recently taken up wrestling the change in programming and the dampening down of feuds didn't make much of a difference to them but to the older fans who had first started watching many moons ago it had a huge impact. Some fans switched off, some even write letters in to the WWE and a quick Google search with the relevant wording shows how many people took to social networking sites and forums to explain their frustration.

Over the past 4 years there has been some great matches. However there are many things which appear to have been left behind and forgotten by the WWE. There appears to be no enthusiasm in the programming, nothing is shocking anymore, no more limos being blown up and no more daredevil antics. Storylines have been affected, feuds have had disappointing endings and gimmick matches simply have no meaning at all. With the company being PG what exactly is the point of having matches such as Hell in a Cell, Extreme Rules, Falls Count Anywhere and No Disqualification? They simply are not the same anymore. Before 2008 we had hardcore wrestling, blood was the norm and there was that big match feel with a number of feuds. We have seen company employees who are use to working behind desks being used as on screen talents (granted they were former wrestlers). We have also seen WWE trying to build off its past regularly trying to get former wrestlers to return for one off appearances - The Rock being a perfect example. Point being there have been no real characters built and there isn't enough within the company today. WWE had a massive selection to choose from between 1998 - 2004 whether they were a face or a heel they were good enough to lead the company. Another issue is the matches and booking which has become predictable. With all of these issues fans have become annoyed, many are not watching anymore and have chosen other alternatives such as the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).

Up until recently it looked like the PG rating was going to stay for a while. However, over the past few weeks WWE's flagship show has suffered its worst ratings in 15 years. It has taken the CEO Vince McMahon to breath life into the company. His appearance on RAW last Monday brung the crowd to their feet. Even the arena was shaking. It was clear that McMahon had decided to change the direction of the company and perhaps bring back some of the elements which made the Attitude Era so successful. So, who knows we may see a return to a more edgier product sooner than we expected.

The question is when?
 
Last edited:

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
135,130
Reaction score
37,551
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
Vierwership grew for WWE with the 15 and under and 35 and over demographic.

Which means parents and their kids are the ones tuning in to watch WWE programming. Rehashing old tired concepts like Attitude isn't going to fix things, it's like Sex Pistols doing reunion tours, it doesn't mean the same thing.

ECW reunion shows are only enjoyed by people who were there when it was something. You don't go for that demo, you go for the one that will be there longer, like younger kids and their parents, who stopped watching because the shit wasn't appropriate for kids.

Duh.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
358,427
Reaction score
139,669
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
I could easily write a column of this length about my own views of the PG rating, but I don't feel like it, we obviously don't agree on it though. I don't think anyone really would have even cared about the PG rating near as much if it weren't for the last half of '08 when they were almost a borderline G rating and it was just such a drastic change. Nowadays, however, I'd say the product is better than it was for much of 2002-2008 because you don't have a bunch of stupid, tasteless angles, something I thank God PG doesn't allow. If you think about it, PG really doesn't even limit that much besides swearing, blood and sex. I couldn't care less about any of that in wrestling. I don't believe the PG rating is much of a factor for why WWE is losing fans, the rating of the show doesn't effect the writer's incompetence and outright stupidity.
 

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,160
Reaction score
2,520
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
The Rating isn't determined by the WWE they can influence the rating but they've done nothing as of late that would show your theory being correct.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
I have never harped on the PG rating like others have. Reason being wrestling has been PG much longer than it has been PG14. There has been good and bad storylines in both PG and PG14. No matter what the rating is it all depends on the writing and wrestlers stepping up. If a T.V rating holds back a wrestler then they simply are boxing themselves in and aren't versatile enough to make anything work. If we didn't have the PG rating then CM Punk's pipe bomb promo wouldn't have made as much of a impact as it did. Toning it down to every now and then push that line is a much better way than just having guys cussing and bleeding all the time for the sake of it.
 

The Cork

Banned
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
4,706
Reaction score
100
Points
63
Age
36
Location
England
Favorite Wrestler
scottsteiner
Favorite Wrestler
brocklesnar
Favorite Wrestler
carlito
Favorite Wrestler
goldburg
Favorite Wrestler
jakeroberts
Favorite Wrestler
paige
PG has always been there.

It's not the rating, it's the writing.
 

We Are Legion

║▌║█║▌||| ║▌║▌█ ║█║║▌||
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
92
Points
53
Location
Montreal, QC
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Favorite Wrestler
ricflair
Favorite Wrestler
jbl2
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Most Attitude era fans just don't understand that WWE was only edgy so it could compete with another edgy program that was getting higher ratings. If WCW had never went there, WWE wouldn't have either. And the edgy stuff isn't why WCW was winning, it was the fact that they offered a product that was fresh (luchadors, old faces showcased as completely different characters, etc), far-superior story lines, celebrity involvement that didn't suck, and original concepts like WW3 and Battlebowl.

WWE never forgot anything that made them successful. Quite to the contrary, WWE remembered quite well, which is why they moved away from the crash TV stuff and reacquired their target demographic which made them so successful in the 80's and nearly drove the NWA into extinction.

I miss the stuff the Attitude era gave us as well, but like deezy said, if they just reverted to that now out of the blue for no other reason than to appease the fans of that era no one (not even those old fans) would like it because it still wouldn't be the same. It would just drive away a lot of WWE's sponsors and likely piss off a lot of parents whose young children have already become locked into WWE programming. You actually run the risk of losing more viewers than you gain. It might seem like a success at first, I'm sure there would be a ratings spike for the first few weeks with old fans tuning in to see what's going on, but you seriously can't expect them to stay. The nostalgia value will wear off quickly because ultimately it still wouldn't be anything they haven't already seen. And it still isn't REAL like MMA, which is what most people of that demographic are into now (and satisfied with it). You're never going to bring those fans back completely. Not like they were hooked during the Attitude era, it's just not possible. Especially without a rival promotion spicing up the IRL element.
 

AF.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
2,088
Reaction score
27
Points
48
WWE sucks, but it isn't because of the PG rating. It's because of Vince and his 'creative' team not being creative enough.
 

We Are Legion

║▌║█║▌||| ║▌║▌█ ║█║║▌||
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
92
Points
53
Location
Montreal, QC
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Favorite Wrestler
ricflair
Favorite Wrestler
jbl2
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
WWE sucks, but it isn't because of the PG rating. It's because of Vince and his 'creative' team not being creative enough.
You could be a little more creative with your responses as well tbh.