Rumored Top 3 WM Matches

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,022
Reaction score
8,923
Points
113
Age
25
I hope a stipulation comes about for John Cena vs. The Rock, like, last man standing, or I quit

NO NO NO :lol: a match of this caliber needs no stip. Just a good clean wrestling match between two of the best
 

Fuji Vice

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
25,224
Reaction score
673
Points
118
Age
45
Favorite Wrestler
stanhansen
Favorite Wrestler
brusierbrody
Favorite Wrestler
rickrude
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Yes, I agree. Besides, stipulation matches distract from the match itself. Cena/Punk is a lot of people's MOTY, and it didn't have any stips attached. If it had been LMS, I doubt people would have looked at it as fondly.
 

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
170,043
Reaction score
34,322
Points
148
Age
37
Location
Wrestling Forums
Website
wrestlingsmarks.com
Favorite Wrestler
emma
Favorite Wrestler
YA1yyED
Favorite Wrestler
frmoJZU
Favorite Wrestler
nock3cf
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan3
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
Sometimes a stip can give a match more excitement but most of the time they don't need 'em. Especially if it's a first encounter.

HHH/UT should get a stip though. Three standard matches at 'Mania wears a little thin.

I'd prefer we didn't get that match at all though. But I'm sure you all know my feelings about Undertaker's WrestleMania matches by now... :lol:

Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,022
Reaction score
8,923
Points
113
Age
25
I'm really stoked for undertaker and triple h III. Taker facing a veteran makes the match feel more special. Not only do I think that guys like wade barrett and sheamus not have the caliber to face taker but there's no point in having a young guy challenging the streak only to get buried
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,022
Reaction score
8,923
Points
113
Age
25
What do you have against triple h vs the undertaker #HEEL
 

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
170,043
Reaction score
34,322
Points
148
Age
37
Location
Wrestling Forums
Website
wrestlingsmarks.com
Favorite Wrestler
emma
Favorite Wrestler
YA1yyED
Favorite Wrestler
frmoJZU
Favorite Wrestler
nock3cf
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan3
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
Just that match? I've seen it twice already.

Undertaker and WrestleMania in general? Check the unpopular opinions thread.

I'm really stoked for undertaker and triple h III. Taker facing a veteran makes the match feel more special. Not only do I think that guys like wade barrett and sheamus not have the caliber to face taker but there's no point in having a young guy challenging the streak only to get buried
I agree. There's no point in a young guy getting buried by Undertaker.


Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk
 

Postman Dave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
10,061
Reaction score
165
Points
63
Age
35
Location
UK
What I'm hoping for as a card based on these 3 matches leading:

Rock/Cena
HHH/Undertaker
Punk/Jericho

Henry/Orton/Bryan
Miz/Foley
Kane/Sheamus

well, that's all I've got at the moment but I reckon that's not too bad.
 

Cyrus Riddle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
3,022
Reaction score
49
Points
48
Age
36
Not a bad card at all...I would really prefer that they include MITB at 'Mania, thus doing away with the gimmick PPV of it. The fact that you could only see one MITB match a year, and it was at Wrestlemania, made it special.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,022
Reaction score
8,923
Points
113
Age
25
Daniel Bryan would have never gotten his opportunity if it weren't for the money bank pay per view
 

Cyrus Riddle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
3,022
Reaction score
49
Points
48
Age
36
True, but you could also argue that had he been given the opportunity to win MITB at WM as opposed to the PPV in July, he might look like a stronger competitor than he does currently. It's all about value, having two guys with a briefcase isn't nearly as effective as having one guy with a briefcase.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,022
Reaction score
8,923
Points
113
Age
25
Yeah but if he won it at wrestlemania then he couldn't cash in at wrestlemania unless he cashed in the same night or waited a year.
 

Cyrus Riddle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
3,022
Reaction score
49
Points
48
Age
36
True, but if given a year to build, you can't go wrong with the right pacing. In a year's time, you can make Daniel Bryan just as appealing as CM Punk, establish him as a threat, and have fans want to pay to see him at 'Mania wreslting for one of the belts.